欢迎进入网站

股票杠杆交易策略分享

当前位置: 股票杠杆交易策略分享 > 服务中心 > 文章页

中国经济网

时间:2024-09-07 01:35来源: 作者:admin 点击: 17 次
巴菲特写给股东的信 (一九九五年)度              BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 波克夏海瑟崴股份有限公司 To the Sharehold


巴菲特写给股东的信 (一九九五年)度

 
 
 
   


   BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.

波克夏海瑟崴股份有限公司

To the Shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.:

致所有股东:

Our gain in net worth during 1995 was $5.3 billion, or

45.0%. Per-share book value grew by a little less, 43.1%,

because we paid stock for two acquisitions, increasing our shares

outstanding by 1.3%. Over the last 31 years (that is, since

present management took over) per-share book value has grown from

$19 to $14,426, or at a rate of 23.6% compounded annually.

1995年本公司的净值成长了45 %约53亿美元,但由于去年以发行股份的方式
并购了两家公司,使得发行在外股份增加了1.3%,所以每股净值仅成长了
43.1%,而总计过去31年以来,也就是自从现有经营阶层接手之后,每股净值
由当初的19元成长到现在的14,426美元,年复合成长率约为23.6%。

There's no reason to do handsprings over 1995's gains. This

was a year in which any fool could make a bundle in the stock

market. And we did. To paraphrase President Kennedy, a rising

tide lifts all yachts.

对于1995年能够有这样的成果并没有什么值得好高兴的,因为在去年那样的股
票市场状况,任何一个笨蛋都可以很轻易在市场上有所斩获,我们当然也不例
外,套句肯尼迪总统说过的一句话,只要一波大浪来就可以撑起所有的船只。

Putting aside the financial results, there was plenty of

good news at Berkshire last year: We negotiated three

acquisitions of exactly the type we desire. Two of these,

Helzberg's Diamond Shops and R.C. Willey Home Furnishings, are

included in our 1995 financial statements, while our largest

transaction, the purchase of GEICO, closed immediately after the

end of the year. (I'll tell you more about all three acquisitions later in
the report.)

先不管亮丽的财务数字,去年对Berkshire来说,有许多令人振奋的好消息,我
们总共谈成了三件我们渴望已久的公司购并交易,其中两家-Helzberg钻石店
与R.C. Willey家具店,将可列入Berkshire 1995年的财务报表之中,而另外
一项更大的交易-买进GEICO剩余全部的股权,则在年度结束后不久正式敲定
(在年报后面会再详加叙述这三件并购交易)。

These new subsidiaries roughly double our revenues. Even

so, the acquisitions neither materially increased our shares

outstanding nor our debt. And, though these three operations

employ over 11,000 people, our headquarters staff grew only from

11 to 12. (No sense going crazy.)

这些新加入的子公司将使我们的营收增加一倍,然而购并之后公司流通在外的股
份或是负债并没有增加多少;另外,虽然这三家公司旗下员工人数合计高达
11,000人,但集团总部的人员却仅由11人增加为12人,(我们还没有到走火
入魔的地步)。

Charlie Munger, Berkshire's Vice Chairman and my partner,

and I want to build a collection of companies - both wholly- and

partly-owned - that have excellent economic characteristics and

that are run by outstanding managers. Our favorite acquisition

is the negotiated transaction that allows us to purchase 100% of

such a business at a fair price. But we are almost as happy when

the stock market offers us the chance to buy a modest percentage

of an outstanding business at a pro-rata price well below what it

would take to buy 100%. This double-barrelled approach -

purchases of entire businesses through negotiation or purchases

of part-interests through the stock market - gives us an

important advantage over capital-allocators who stick to a single

course. Woody Allen once explained why eclecticism works: "The

real advantage of being bisexual is that it doubles your chances

for a date on Saturday night."

Berkshire的副主席,同时也是我的主要合伙人-查理.曼格以及我本人一直致
力于建立起一个拥有绝佳竞争优势,且由杰出经理人领导的企业所组成的集团,
其中一部份是100%持有,一部份则是持有部份股权,当然我们最希望的方式还
是透过协商以公平合理的价格取得全部的股权,不过如果我们在股票市场中有机
会能够找到以低于购并整家公司所需的平均价格,取得一家好公司相当程度的股
份的话,我们也很乐于尝试,事实上这种双管齐下的做法,(也就是经由协议买
下整家公司或是透过股市买进部份股权),使得我们比起其它坚持单一做法的资
金分配者来说,拥有绝佳的优势。伍迪.艾伦曾经用以下的方式来形容为什么会
有折衷派出现,他说:双性恋者最大的好处就是可以让他们在周末时,比一般人
整整多出一倍的约会机会。

Over the years, we've been Woody-like in our thinking,

attempting to increase our marketable investments in wonderful

businesses, while simultaneously trying to buy similar businesses

in their entirety. The following table illustrates our progress

on both fronts. In the tabulation, we show the marketable

securities owned per share of Berkshire at ten-year intervals. A

second column lists our per-share operating earnings (before

taxes and purchase-price adjustments but after interest and

corporate overhead) from all other activities. In other words,

the second column shows what we earned excluding the dividends,

interest and capital gains that we realized from investments.

Purchase-price accounting adjustments are ignored for reasons we

have explained at length in previous reports and which, as an act

of mercy, we won't repeat. (We'll be glad to send masochists the

earlier explanations, however.)

多年来,我们的看法一直与伍迪一致,在努力增加我们非凡企业的投资部位的同
时,也试着买下一些同样优秀企业的全部所有权,下表充分显示了我们在这两方
面的进展,表中列示出在十年间Berkshire每股所拥有的股票价值以及每股在扣
除利息与营业费用之后来自其它活动的营业利益(但未扣除所得税与购买法会计
调整数),换言之,后者所代表的是在扣除我们从股票投资所得的股利、利息收
入与资本利得之后的盈余收益,至于购买法会计调整数不列入的原因,在以前的
年报中,我们已经花了相当的篇幅解释过了,在这个地方我们就不再重复了,当
然如果你有被虐待的倾向的话,我们也不介意再复述一次。

Pre-tax Earnings Per Share

Marketable Securities Excluding All Income from

Year Per Share Investments

---- --------------------- --------------------------

1965 ................ $ 4 $ 4.08

1975 ................ 159 (6.48)

1985 ................ 2,443 18.86

1995 ................ 22,088 258.20

Yearly Growth Rate: 1965-95 33.4% 14.7%

These results have not sprung from some master plan that we

concocted in 1965. In a general way, we knew then what we hoped

to accomplish but had no idea what specific opportunities might

make it possible. Today we remain similarly unstructured: Over

time, we expect to improve the figures in both columns but have

no road map to tell us how that will come about.

当初在1965年时,我们并未刻意规划什么伟大的计划,来达成以上的成果,我
们只知道我们应该朝这个方向做,但却不晓得到底会有什么样的机会会出现,时
至今日,我们同样是漫无目标,只能够预期这两栏的数字都能够持续地精进,至
于应该要如何达成,并没有一个明确的概念。

We proceed with two advantages: First, our operating

managers are outstanding and, in most cases, have an unusually

strong attachment to Berkshire. Second, Charlie and I have had

considerable experience in allocating capital and try to go at

that job rationally and objectively. The giant disadvantage we

face is size: In the early years, we needed only good ideas, but

now we need good big ideas. Unfortunately, the difficulty of

finding these grows in direct proportion to our financial

success, a problem that increasingly erodes our strengths.

我们拥有两项优势,首先,我们旗下事业的经理人都相当优秀,且大部分的经理
人都与Berkshire保持紧密的关系,第二,查理跟我本人在资金分配方面拥有相
当丰富的经验,可以理性客观地执行这项工作,我们所面临最大的劣势是规模太
大,在早年,我们只需要好的投资方案,但是现在我们需要的却是又"大"又好的
投资方案,然而不幸的是,要找到能够与Berkshire发展速度相匹配的公司的难
度日益升高,这个问题持续地侵蚀我们的竞争优势。

I will have more to say about Berkshire's prospects later in

this report, when I discuss our proposed recapitalization.

在报告的后段讨论有关公司所提的股权重组提案,我会再详加说明Berkshire未
来的前景。

Acquisitions

并购活动

It may seem strange that we exult over a year in which we

made three acquisitions, given that we have regularly used these

pages to question the acquisition activities of most managers.

Rest assured, Charlie and I haven't lost our skepticism: We

believe most deals do damage to the shareholders of the acquiring

company. Too often, the words from HMS Pinafore apply: "Things

are seldom what they seem, skim milk masquerades as cream."

Specifically, sellers and their representatives invariably

present financial projections having more entertainment value

than educational value. In the production of rosy scenarios,

Wall Street can hold its own against Washington.

以往到了这里,通常是我们质疑其它公司从事的并购活动的时间,然而大家对于
我们在去年突然发神经地进行了三件并购案可能会感到相当奇怪,不过大家倒是
可以放心,查理跟我本人从来就没有失去我们原来保持的怀疑态度,我们坚信大
部分的并购活动会大大损及发起并购公司背后所代表的股东利益,HMS 围裙说
得没有错?事情通常不是他们外表所看到得的那样,去脂牛奶会被冒充成奶油,
犹有甚者,卖方与其代表人总是会提出一些娱乐性质高于教育性质的财务预估数
字,在规划出美丽的大饼这招方面,华尔街的能力可是不会输给华府的。

In any case, why potential buyers even look at projections

prepared by sellers baffles me. Charlie and I never give them a

glance, but instead keep in mind the story of the man with an

ailing horse. Visiting the vet, he said: "Can you help me?

Sometimes my horse walks just fine and sometimes he limps." The

vet's reply was pointed: "No problem - when he's walking fine,

sell him." In the world of mergers and acquisitions, that horse

would be peddled as Secretariat.

我实在不了解为什么有些可能的买主会相信卖方提出的预估数字,查理跟我连看
都懒得看他们一眼,我们一再谨记一位拥有跛脚马主人的故事,他牵着病马去给
兽医看说到?「你可以帮帮我吗? 我实在是搞不懂为什么这匹马的表现时好时
坏。」,兽医的回答正中要害,「没问题,趁??硐终?5氖焙颍?峡彀??舻簟梗?br> 在并购的世界中,这样的跛脚马往往被装饰成圣物到处行骗。

At Berkshire, we have all the difficulties in perceiving the

future that other acquisition-minded companies do. Like they

also, we face the inherent problem that the seller of a business

practically always knows far more about it than the buyer and

also picks the time of sale - a time when the business is likely

to be walking "just fine."

在Berkshire,我们无从了解这些有意从事并购的公司到底怎么会做出这样的举
动,与他们一样,我们也面临一个先天上的问题,那就是卖方永远比买方了解内
情,所以很自然地,他们一定会挑选卖出的最佳时机,也就是当跛脚马表现的都
很正常的时候。

Even so, we do have a few advantages, perhaps the greatest

being that we don't have a strategic plan. Thus we feel no need

to proceed in an ordained direction (a course leading almost

invariably to silly purchase prices) but can instead simply

decide what makes sense for our owners. In doing that, we always

mentally compare any move we are contemplating with dozens of

other opportunities open to us, including the purchase of small

pieces of the best businesses in the world via the stock market.

Our practice of making this comparison - acquisitions against

passive investments - is a discipline that managers focused

simply on expansion seldom use.

尽管如此,我们还是拥有几项优势,其中最有利的大概就是我们并没有一套策略
计划,所以我们就没有必要依照固定的模式(一种几乎注定会以离谱的价钱成交
的模式),而是完全以股东本身的利益为优先,在这样的心态之下,我们随时可
以客观地将购并案与其它潜在的几十种投资机会做比较,其中也包含经由股票市
场买进部份股权,我们习惯性地做比较,购并vs被动的投资,是一昧地想要扩
张经营版图的经理人绝对做不出来的。

Talking to Time Magazine a few years back, Peter Drucker got

to the heart of things: "I will tell you a secret: Dealmaking

beats working. Dealmaking is exciting and fun, and working is

grubby. Running anything is primarily an enormous amount of

grubby detail work . . . dealmaking is romantic, sexy. That's

why you have deals that make no sense."

管理大师彼得.杜拉克几年前在对时代杂志的一次专访中,切中要点的提到?让
我告诉你一个秘密,促成交易比辛勤工作好,促成交易刺激有趣,而工作却尽是
一些肮脏污龊的事,经营任何事业无可避免的是一大堆繁杂的工作,而促成交易
相对的就很性感浪漫,而这也是为什么通常交易的发生都没什么道理可循。

In making acquisitions, we have a further advantage: As

payment, we can offer sellers a stock backed by an extraordinary

collection of outstanding businesses. An individual or a family

wishing to dispose of a single fine business, but also wishing to

defer personal taxes indefinitely, is apt to find Berkshire stock

a particularly comfortable holding. I believe, in fact, that

this calculus played an important part in the two acquisitions

for which we paid shares in 1995.

在从事并购案时,我们还有一项优势,那就是我们可以提供给卖方,一种背后由
众多优秀企业所组成的股份当作对价,当一家公司的老板或家族想要处分绩优的
家族产业,同时希望相关的税负能够继续递延下去时,应该会发现Berkshire的
股票是一种相当好的选择,事实上,我相信这样的盘算在我们1985年促成以股
份交换的两项购并案中扮演极关键的角色。

Beyond that, sellers sometimes care about placing their

companies in a corporate home that will both endure and provide

pleasant, productive working conditions for their managers. Here

again, Berkshire offers something special. Our managers operate

with extraordinary autonomy. Additionally, our ownership

structure enables sellers to know that when I say we are buying

to keep, the promise means something. For our part, we like

dealing with owners who care what happens to their companies and

people. A buyer is likely to find fewer unpleasant surprises

dealing with that type of seller than with one simply auctioning

off his business.

此外,有些卖方也会关心他们的公司是否能够找到一个稳定可靠的美满归宿,可
以让其旗下员工有一个良好的工作环境,而就这点而言,Berkshire绝对与众不
同,我们旗下事业的经理人拥有绝对的自主权,此外我们的股权结构使得卖方可
以相信当我们在购并时,所做出的每一个承诺将会被信守,对我们而言,我们也
希望能与真正关心购并后其公司与员工会有怎样结局的老板打交道,就我们的经
验而言,这类的卖主通常会较那些一心要把所拥有的公司拍卖掉的人,要让我们
少发现许多令人不愉快的意外。

In addition to the foregoing being an explanation of our

acquisition style, it is, of course, a not-so-subtle sales pitch.

If you own or represent a business earning $25 million or more

before tax, and it fits the criteria listed on page 23, just

give me a call. Our discussion will be confidential. And if you

aren't interested now, file our proposition in the back of your

mind: We are never going to lose our appetite for buying

companies with good economics and excellent management.

以上算是对于我们购并模式的一些解释,当然在这里我也要打一点小广告,如果
你拥有或代表一家每年税前获利超过2,500万美元的公司,同时也符合我们表
列的各项标准的话,记得打个电话给我,我们谈话的内容将会完全保密,当然若
是你现在没有兴趣,也请你把我们的这些条件记在脑海,因为我们从来就不会放
弃买下拥有优良的竞争优势与杰出经理人的公司的意愿。

Concluding this little dissertation on acquisitions, I can't

resist repeating a tale told me last year by a corporate

executive. The business he grew up in was a fine one, with a

long-time record of leadership in its industry. Its main

product, however, was distressingly glamorless. So several

decades ago, the company hired a management consultant who -

naturally - advised diversification, the then-current fad.

("Focus" was not yet in style.) Before long, the company

acquired a number of businesses, each after the consulting firm

had gone through a long - and expensive - acquisition study. And

the outcome? Said the executive sadly, "When we started, we were

getting 100% of our earnings from the original business. After

ten years, we were getting 150%."

为了将以上购并论点做一个总结,我忍不住再重复一遍,去年一位企业经理人告
诉我的一则小故事?他提到他原来经营一家由他一手扶持的好公司,在其所处的
产业拥有长期的领导地位,只是其前景显得有些黯淡,所以几十年前,这家公司
特别聘请了一家管理顾问公司,很自然的管理顾问建议他们应该要多角化经营,
这在当时还是股风潮(专注本业的论调还未成形),不久之后,这家公司在经过顾
问公司一连串冗长且收费昂贵的购并调查之后,陆续买进了好几家公司,你一定
会想要问,最后结果如何? 这位主管很难过的说,一开始我们的盈余百分之百是
来自于我们原来的本业,但是过了十年后,这个比例变成百分之一百五十!

Helzberg's Diamond Shops

Helzberg 钻石店

A few years back, management consultants popularized a

technique called "management by walking around" (MBWA). At

Berkshire, we've instituted ABWA (acquisitions by walking

around).

几年前,管理顾问专家有一句相当流行的术语-走动式管理,在Berkshire我们
运用的则是走动式并购。

In May 1994, a week or so after the Annual Meeting, I was

crossing the street at 58th and Fifth Avenue in New York, when a

woman called out my name. I listened as she told me she'd been

to, and had enjoyed, the Annual Meeting. A few seconds later, a

man who'd heard the woman stop me did so as well. He turned out

to be Barnett Helzberg, Jr., who owned four shares of Berkshire

and had also been at our meeting.

1994年五月,在年度股东会过后不久,正当我在纽约第五大道与58街交叉路
口准备过马路时,突然有一位妇人叫我的名字,我停下驻足,她提到自己很喜欢
参加Berkshire的股东会,过了一会儿,旁边一位先生听到这位妇人的谈话,也
如法炮制的把我给拦下来,没想到他竟是Barnett Helzberg二世,他持有
Berkshire四股的股份,同时也曾参加过我们的股东会。

In our few minutes of conversation, Barnett said he had a

business we might be interested in. When people say that, it

usually turns out they have a lemonade stand - with potential, of

course, to quickly grow into the next Microsoft. So I simply

asked Barnett to send me particulars. That, I thought to myself.

will be the end of that.

在我们短暂的交谈之中,Barnett表示他拥有一家我们可能会有兴趣的公司,普
通当人们这样说的时候,一般都是指一些茶水摊,当然搞不好,也有可能会变成
微软第二,所以我只是简单地请Barnett将他的数据送给我,然后我想一切将就
此结束。

Not long after, Barnett sent me the financial statements of

Helzberg's Diamond Shops. The company had been started by his

grandfather in 1915 from a single store in Kansas City and had

developed by the time we met into a group with 134 stores in 23

states. Sales had grown from $10 million in 1974 to $53 million

in 1984 and $282 million in 1994. We weren't talking lemonade

stands.

过了不久,Barnett果然把Helzberg钻石店的财务报表送给我,这家公司是在
1915年由其祖父创立,当初只不过是在堪萨斯市的一家单店,然而直到我们碰
面时,该公司已发展成在全美23个州拥有134家分店的集团,营业额也从1974
年的1,000万美元成长到1984年的5,300万美元,乃至于1994年的二亿
8,200万美元,这显然不是一间茶水摊。

Barnett, then 60, loved the business but also wanted to feel

free of it. In 1988, as a step in that direction, he had brought

in Jeff Comment, formerly President of Wanamaker's, to help him

run things. The hiring of Jeff turned out to be a homerun, but

Barnett still found that he couldn't shake a feeling of ultimate

responsibility. Additionally, he owned a valuable asset that was

subject to the vagaries of a single, very competitive industry,

and he thought it prudent to diversify his family's holdings.

Barnett现年六十岁,很热爱这项事业,但也很希望能够减轻负担,在1988年
他跨出第一步,找到Wanamaker前任总裁-Jeff Comment来协助他经营事
业,这个决定事后证明相当正确,但Barnett还是觉得他的压力相当沉重,而且,
他虽然拥有价值不菲的事业,但却面临单一且竞争相当激烈的产业,因此他认为
有必要要分散家族持股的风险。

Berkshire was made to order for him. It took us awhile to

get together on price, but there was never any question in my

mind that, first, Helzberg's was the kind of business that we

wanted to own and, second, Jeff was our kind of manager. In

fact, we would not have bought the business if Jeff had not been

there to run it. Buying a retailer without good management is

like buying the Eiffel Tower without an elevator.

Berkshire被要求提出一个报价,我们花了一段时间才在价格上达成协议,然而
此外从头到尾我都没有太多的疑问,首先,Helzberg是那种我们想要拥有的事
业,第二Jeff,是属于我们这喜欢的经理人类型,事实上,要是这项事业不是由
Jeff所经营的话,我们可能就不会考虑买下它,买下一家没有优良管理的零售
业,就好像是买下一座没有电梯的艾菲尔铁塔。

We completed the Helzberg purchase in 1995 by means of a

tax-free exchange of stock, the only kind of transaction that

interested Barnett. Though he was certainly under no obligation

to do so, Barnett shared a meaningful part of his proceeds from

the sale with a large number of his associates. When someone

behaves that generously, you know you are going to be treated

right as a buyer.

我们在1995年完成对Helzberg的并购案,以免税的股权交换方式进行,这也
是Barnett唯一愿意接受的方式,虽然没有法令规定,但是他还是将并购后的所
得与其众多的员工一起分享,就这点而言,你可以确信对员工如此慷慨的人,相
信也会公平合理地对待新加入的买主。

The average Helzberg's store has annual sales of about $2

million, far more than competitors operating similarly-sized

stores achieve. This superior per-store productivity is the key

to Helzberg's excellent profits. If the company continues its

first-rate performance - and we believe it will - it could grow

rather quickly to several times its present size.

Helzberg单店年平均营业额大约是二百万美元,这个数字远比其它相同规模的
竞争对手多得多,这种高生产力正是Helzberg拥有高获利的关键因素,如果这
家公司能够继续这种一流的表现,(我们相信绝对没问题),则在不久的将来它将
可以发展为数倍于现在的规模。

Helzberg's, it should be added, is an entirely different

sort of operation from Borsheim's, our Omaha jewelry business,

and the two companies will operate independently of each other.

Borsheim's had an excellent year in 1995, with sales up 11.7%.

Susan Jacques, its 36-year-old CEO, had an even better year,

giving birth to her second son at the start of the Christmas

season. Susan has proved to be a terrific leader in the two

years since her promotion.

有一点必须强调的是,Helzberg经营的形态与我们原有在奥玛哈的珠宝事业-
波仙珠宝店完全不同,两家公司仍然会维持各自独立的营运,波仙1995年的业
绩相当理想,营收较去年又增加了11.7%,该公司总裁-Susan Jacques的表现
更是优异,去年圣诞节前夕她产下第二个儿子,在接任二年后,Susan证明自己
是位相当杰出的领导者。

R.C. Willey Home Furnishings

R.C. Willey家具店

It was Nebraska Furniture Mart's Irv Blumkin who did the

walking around in the case of R.C. Willey, long the leading home

furnishings business in Utah. Over the years, Irv had told me

about the strengths of that company. And he had also told Bill

Child, CEO of R.C. Willey, how pleased the Blumkin family had

been with its Berkshire relationship. So in early 1995, Bill

mentioned to Irv that for estate tax and diversification reasons,

he and the other owners of R.C. Willey might be interested in

selling.

关于R.C. Willey家具店-这家犹他州最大家具店的并购案,这次换做是内布拉
斯加家具店的Irv Blumkin做走动式并购,多年以来,Irv一直向我提及这家公
司所拥有的竞争力,而他也不断地告诉R.C. Willey总裁-Bill Child,Blumkin
家族与Berkshire的合作关系是多么地令人愉快,终于到了1995年,Bill向Irv
提及基于资产税负与分散风险考量,他自己本身与R.C. Willey其它股东有意出
售该公司股份。

From that point forward, things could not have been simpler.

Bill sent me some figures, and I wrote him a letter indicating

my idea of value. We quickly agreed on a number, and found our

personal chemistry to be perfect. By mid-year, the merger was

completed.

从那一刻开始,事情就变得再简单也不过了,Bill给了我一些数字,而我则回信
表达我对价值的看法,我们很快地就达成价格上的协议,而后续所产生的化学变
化可说是再完美不过了,一直到年中,整个合并案大功告成。

R.C. Willey is an amazing story. Bill took over the

business from his father-in-law in 1954 when sales were about

$250,000. From this tiny base, Bill employed Mae West's

philosophy: "It's not what you've got - it's what you do with

what you've got." Aided by his brother, Sheldon, Bill has built

the company to its 1995 sales volume of $257 million, and it now

accounts for over 50% of the furniture business in Utah. Like

Nebraska Furniture Mart, R.C. Willey sells appliances,

electronics, computers and carpets in addition to furniture.

Both companies have about the same sales volume, but NFM gets all

of its business from one complex in Omaha, whereas R.C. Willey

will open its sixth major store in the next few months.

R.C. Willey有一段相当精彩的故事,1954年当Bill从其岳父手中接下这项事业
时,该公司的年营业额只有25万美元,从那个基础开始,Bill运用Mae West
的哲学,重点不在于你得到的是什么,重点在于你将得到的如何运用,在其兄弟
Sheldon的协助之下,Bill将公司的营业额一举提升到1995年的2亿5,700
万美元,目前拥有犹他州超过50%以上的市场占有率,就像是NFM一样,除了
家具以外,R.C. Willey也贩卖小家电、电子信息与地毯等商品,两家公司的营
业额相当,只是NFM的营收全部来自在奥玛哈惟一的一家总店,而R.C. Willey
却即将在几个月后成立第六家分店。

Retailing is a tough business. During my investment career,

I have watched a large number of retailers enjoy terrific growth

and superb returns on equity for a period, and then suddenly

nosedive, often all the way into bankruptcy. This shooting-star

phenomenon is far more common in retailing than it is in

manufacturing or service businesses. In part, this is because a

retailer must stay smart, day after day. Your competitor is

always copying and then topping whatever you do. Shoppers are

meanwhile beckoned in every conceivable way to try a stream of

new merchants. In retailing, to coast is to fail.

零售业的经营相当不易,在我个人的投资生涯中,我看过许多零售业曾经拥有极
高的成长率与股东权益报酬率,但是到最后,突然间表现急速下滑,很多甚至被
迫以倒闭关门收场,比起一般制造业或服务业,这种?x那间的永恒在零售业履见
不鲜,部份的原因是这些零售业者必须时时保持聪明警戒,因为你的竞争对手随
时准备复制你的做法,然后超越你,同时消费者绝对不会吝于给予新加入业者尝
试的机会,在零售业一但业绩下滑,注定就会失败。

In contrast to this have-to-be-smart-every-day business,

there is what I call the have-to-be-smart-once business. For

example, if you were smart enough to buy a network TV station

very early in the game, you could put in a shiftless and backward

nephew to run things, and the business would still do well for

decades. You'd do far better, of course, if you put in Tom

Murphy, but you could stay comfortably in the black without him.

For a retailer, hiring that nephew would be an express ticket to

bankruptcy.

相对于这种必须时时保持警戒的产业,还有一种我称之为只要聪明一时的产业,
举个例子来说,如果你在很早以前就懂得睿智地买下一家地方电视台,你甚至可
以把它交给懒惰又差劲的亲人来经营,而这项事业却仍然可以好好地经营个几十
年,当然若是你懂得将Tom Murphy摆在正确的位置之上,你所获得的将会更
惊人,但是对零售业来说,要是用人不当的话,就等于买了一张准备倒闭关门的
门票。

The two retailing businesses we purchased this year are

blessed with terrific managers who love to compete and have done

so successfully for decades. Like the CEOs of our other

operating units, they will operate autonomously: We want them to

feel that the businesses they run are theirs. This means no

second-guessing by Charlie and me. We avoid the attitude of the

alumnus whose message to the football coach is "I'm 100% with you

- win or tie." Our basic goal as an owner is to behave with our

managers as we like our owners to behave with us.

不过今年我们买下的这两家零售业,却很幸运的拥有喜欢面对竞争挑战的经理
人,同时过去几十年来也表现的相当优异,就像是我们旗下其它事业的经理人,
他们将可以独立自主地经营事业,我们希望他们觉得就好像是在经营自己的事业
一样,没错就是这样,查理跟我绝没有其它的意思,我们尽量避免像校友会常常
对足球校队教练所说的那样?不论赢或是打平,我们永远与你站在同一阵线,身
为所有权人,我们的基本原则是期望我们自己的行为与我们要求旗下的经理人的
表现一样。

As we add more operations, I'm sometimes asked how many

people I can handle reporting to me. My answer to that is

simple: If I have one person reporting to me and he is a lemon,

that's one too many, and if I have managers like those we now

have, the number can be almost unlimited. We are lucky to have

Bill and Sheldon associated with us, and we hope that we can

acquire other businesses that bring with them managers of similar

caliber.

而在我们又新增旗下事业的同时,我被问及我一个人到底可以应付多少个经理人
同时向我报告,我的回答相当简单,要是我只管一个经理人,而他是一颗酸柠檬,
那么管一个人对我来说,实在是太多了,相反的,要是我所面对的是像我们现在
所拥有的经理人的话,那么这个数目将没有任何限制,很幸运的是,这回新加入
的是Bill跟Sheldon,而我们也很希望在不久的未来,还能有更多相同水准的经
理人加入我们的行列。

GEICO Corporation

盖可保险营运

Right after yearend, we completed the purchase of 100% of

GEICO, the seventh largest auto insurer in the United States,

with about 3.7 million cars insured. I've had a 45-year

association with GEICO, and though the story has been told

before, it's worth a short recap here.

就在去年底,我们完成买进盖可保险100%股权的动作,盖可是全美第七大的汽
车保险公司,约有370万辆汽车加保,我个人与盖可保险的关系长达45年以
上,虽然这段故事已经说过很多遍,我认为还是有必要在这里稍微复述一次。

I attended Columbia University's business school in 1950-51,

not because I cared about the degree it offered, but because I

wanted to study under Ben Graham, then teaching there. The time

I spent in Ben's classes was a personal high, and quickly induced

me to learn all I could about my hero. I turned first to Who's

Who in America, finding there, among other things, that Ben was

Chairman of Government Employees Insurance Company, to me an

unknown company in an unfamiliar industry.

我是在1950年-1951年间就读于哥伦比亚商学院,当时的目的倒不在于取得
学位,重点还在于我可以受教于当时在该校任教的班哲明.葛拉汉门下,上葛拉
汉的课实在是一种享受,很快的就让我从偶像哪里学习到许多东西,有一回我翻
开全美名人录,发现我的恩师葛拉汉是公务人员保险公司-GEICO的董事会主
席,对于当时的我而言,那完全是一家陌生产业的不知名公司。

A librarian next referred me to Best's Fire and Casualty

insurance manual, where I learned that GEICO was based in

Washington, DC. So on a Saturday in January, 1951, I took the

train to Washington and headed for GEICO's downtown headquarters.

To my dismay, the building was closed, but I pounded on the door

until a custodian appeared. I asked this puzzled fellow if there

was anyone in the office I could talk to, and he said he'd seen

one man working on the sixth floor.

一位好心的图书馆员,介绍我看看全美最佳火险与意外险公司手册,我发现
GEICO的总部位于华盛顿特区,所以在1951年一月的某个星期六,我搭乘火
车前往位于华盛顿的GEICO总部,一到当地,令人失望的是总部大门深锁,朝
着大门敲了半天,终于有位守卫前来应门,我向这位一脸疑惑的警卫先生问到,
公司是否有人可以跟我谈一谈,他老兄说六楼有人在加班,你可以去找他试一
试。

And thus I met Lorimer Davidson, Assistant to the President,

who was later to become CEO. Though my only credentials were

that I was a student of Graham's, "Davy" graciously spent four

hours or so showering me with both kindness and instruction. No

one has ever received a better half-day course in how the

insurance industry functions nor in the factors that enable one

company to excel over others. As Davy made clear, GEICO's method

of selling - direct marketing - gave it an enormous cost

advantage over competitors that sold through agents, a form of

distribution so ingrained in the business of these insurers that

it was impossible for them to give it up. After my session with

Davy, I was more excited about GEICO than I have ever been about

a stock.

就这样我遇到了当时还是副总裁的Lorimer Davidson,后来他成为GEICO的
总裁,虽然我唯一的经历背景只是葛拉汉的一名学生,戴维还是很好心的花了四
个小时左右的时间,好好地给我上了一课,我想大概没有人能够像我这样,可以
幸运地接受如何经营保险业的半天课程,戴维很坦白地告诉我,GEICO的竞争
优势在于-直接行销,这使得该公司相较于一般竞争同业必须透过传统的业务仲
介的经营方式所负担的成本要低得许多,后者受限传统无法摆脱行之有年的行销
网络,而在上过戴维的课之后,GEICO也成为我有生以来觉得最心动的一支股
票。

When I finished at Columbia some months later and returned

to Omaha to sell securities, I naturally focused almost

exclusively on GEICO. My first sales call - on my Aunt Alice,

who always supported me 100% - was successful. But I was then a

skinny, unpolished 20-year-old who looked about 17, and my pitch

usually failed. Undaunted, I wrote a short report late in 1951

about GEICO for "The Security I Like Best" column in The

Commercial and Financial Chronicle, a leading financial

publication of the time. More important, I bought stock for my

own account.

在我从哥伦比亚大学毕业的几个月后,我回到奥玛哈担任股票业务员,自然而然
的,我把重心全部摆在GEICO这只股票之上,我作成的第一笔生意就是把它介
绍给总是最支持我的阿姨Alice,不过当时的我只是个20岁初出茅庐的小伙子,
所以我的话总是没有人愿意相信,即便如此,我还是在1951年写了一篇最佳推
荐个股-GEICO并刊登在当时最大的金融时报专栏之上,当然最重要的是我自己
也买了这家公司的股票。

You may think this odd, but I have kept copies of every tax

return I filed, starting with the return for 1944. Checking

back, I find that I purchased GEICO shares on four occasions

during 1951, the last purchase being made on September 26. This

pattern of persistence suggests to me that my tendency toward

self-intoxication was developed early. I probably came back on

that September day from unsuccessfully trying to sell some

prospect and decided - despite my already having more than 50% of

my net worth in GEICO - to load up further. In any event, I

accumulated 350 shares of GEICO during the year, at a cost of

$10,282. At yearend, this holding was worth $13,125, more than

65% of my net worth.

你可能会觉得很奇怪,不过打从1944年开始报税到现在,我都保留每年个人报
税的数据,在将这些资料拿出来比对之后,我发现在1951年我总共分四次买进
GEICO股份,最后一次是在9月26日,这样的做法让我觉得自己很早就有自
我沈醉的倾向,印象中我那时是在向别人推销这批股票不成之后,决定自己吃下
这批股票,尽管在当时我已将个人50%以上的身家全都押在这支股票之上,而
在加码之后,我总共持有350股的GEICO股份,成本为10,282美元,到了年
底,这些股票的市值成为13,125美元,超过个人净值的65%。

You can see why GEICO was my first business love. Furthermore,

just to complete this stroll down memory lane, I should add

that I earned most of the funds I used to buy GEICO shares by

delivering The Washington Post, the chief product of a

company that much later made it possible for Berkshire to turn

$10 million into $500 million.

所以大家可以看出GEICO公司可以说是我投资生涯的初恋,还有一点也相当具
有纪念价值的,我买下GEICO大部分的资金是来自于派送华盛顿邮报的收入,
而后来经由Berkshire我靠着华盛顿邮报,将1,000万美元变成五亿美元。

Alas, I sold my entire GEICO position in 1952 for $15,259,

primarily to switch into Western Insurance Securities. This act

of infidelity can partially be excused by the fact that Western

was selling for slightly more than one times its current earnings,

a p/e ratio that for some reason caught my eye. But in the next

20 years, the GEICO stock I sold grew in value to about $1.3

million, which taught me a lesson about the inadvisability of

selling a stake in an identifiably-wonderful company.

可惜的是,在1952年我以15,259美元的价钱将全部的GEICO股份出清,然
后将所得资金投入到西方保险证券公司之上,这项变心的举动,一部份的原因是
因为西方保险证券当时的股价相当吸引人,本益比只有一倍左右,然而在往后的
二十年间,当时被我卖的的GEICO股份的价值却成长到1,300万美元,这样的
结局让我体会到绝对不能卖掉一家明显的好公司的原则。

In the early 1970's, after Davy retired, the executives

running GEICO made some serious errors in estimating their claims

costs, a mistake that led the company to underprice its policies

- and that almost caused it to go bankrupt. The company was

saved only because Jack Byrne came in as CEO in 1976 and took

drastic remedial measures.

1970年代初期,在戴维退休后不久,继任的管理阶层犯了一连串严重的错误,
他们低估了保险理赔的成本,使得公司对外销售保单的订价过低,此举导致公司
几乎面临倒闭的命运,所幸后来由Jack Byrne在1976年接掌公司,并采取紧
急的补救措施后,才使得公司幸免于难。

Because I believed both in Jack and in GEICO's fundamental

competitive strength, Berkshire purchased a large interest in the

company during the second half of 1976, and also made smaller

purchases later. By yearend 1980, we had put $45.7 million into

GEICO and owned 33.3% of its shares. During the next 15 years,

we did not make further purchases. Our interest in the company,

nonetheless, grew to about 50% because it was a big repurchaser

of its own shares.

由于我相信Jack以及该公司原本拥有的竞争优势,Berkshire在1976年下半
年买进大量的GEICO股份,之后又小幅加码,到了1980年底,我们总共投入
4,570万美元取得该公司33.3%的股权,然而在往后的15年内,我们并没有再
增加持股,不过由于该公司不断地购回自家公司的股份,使得我们在GEICO的
持股比例逐渐增加到50%左右。

Then, in 1995, we agreed to pay $2.3 billion for the half of

the company we didn't own. That is a steep price. But it gives

us full ownership of a growing enterprise whose business remains

exceptional for precisely the same reasons that prevailed in

1951. In addition, GEICO has two extraordinary managers: Tony

Nicely, who runs the insurance side of the operation, and Lou

Simpson, who runs investments.

然后到了1995年,我们同意以23亿美元买下另一半原来不属于我们的股份,
这是实在是天价,不过它让我们可以百分之百拥有一家深具成长潜力的企业,且
其竞争优势从1951年到现在一直都维持不变,更重要的是,GEICO拥有两位
相当优秀的经理人,一位是专门负责保险部门营运的Tony Nicely,一位是专门
负责投资部门营运的Lou Simpson。

Tony, 52, has been with GEICO for 34 years. There's no one

I would rather have managing GEICO's insurance operation. He has

brains, energy, integrity and focus. If we're lucky, he'll stay

another 34 years.

52岁的Tony在GEICO任职已有34年了,兼具智能、精力、品格与专注力,
他是我心目中经营GEICO保险部门的不二人选,如果我们够幸运的话,Tony
应该还能再为我们经营GEICO 34年以上。

Lou runs investments just as ably. Between 1980 and 1995,

the equities under Lou's management returned an average of 22.8%

annually vs. 15.7% for the S&P. Lou takes the same conservative,

concentrated approach to investments that we do at Berkshire, and

it is an enormous plus for us to have him on board. One point

that goes beyond Lou's GEICO work: His presence on the scene

assures us that Berkshire would have an extraordinary

professional immediately available to handle its investments if

something were to happen to Charlie and me.

另一方面,Lou在管理投资同样出色,从1980年到1995年的这段期间,GEICO
的投资在Lou的管理之下,年度平均投资报酬率高达22.8%,同期间S&P只有
15.7%,Lou在GEICO所采取谨慎保守、专注集中的投资方式与Berkshire一
致,有他在,对Berkshire来说绝对有相当大的帮助,而他的存在同时也使得
Berkshire可以确保查理跟我本人万一要是有任何突发状况时,能够有一位杰出
的专业人士可以立即接手我们的工作。

GEICO, of course, must continue both to attract good

policyholders and keep them happy. It must also reserve and

price properly. But the ultimate key to the company's success is

its rock-bottom operating costs, which virtually no competitor

can match. In 1995, moreover, Tony and his management team

pushed underwriting and loss adjustment expenses down further to

23.6% of premiums, nearly one percentage point below 1994's

ratio. In business, I look for economic castles protected by

unbreachable "moats." Thanks to Tony and his management team,

GEICO's moat widened in 1995.

GEICO如同过往一般,持续地吸引优良的保户前来,而GEICO的服务也确实令
他们满意,当然订价与提列准备必须适当,但是该公司能够成功的最重要关键,
还在于超低的成本结构,这实在是其它竞争同业远远比不上的,1995年在Tony
与其领导的经营阶层的努力之下,该公司的承保损失与营业费用比率进一步压低
到保费收入的23.6%,比起1994年又低了一个百分点,在商业的世界,我致
力于寻找拥有无可侵犯护城河所保护的企业堡垒,感谢Tony跟他的经营团队,
GEICO周围的护城河又更加宽了许多。

Finally, let me bring you up to date on Davy. He's now 93

and remains my friend and teacher. He continues to pay close

attention to GEICO and has always been there when the company's

CEOs - Jack Byrne, Bill Snyder and Tony - have needed him. Our

acquisition of 100% of GEICO caused Davy to incur a large tax.

Characteristically, he still warmly supported the transaction.

最后让我向各位报告一下戴维的近况,高龄93岁的他,对我而言亦师亦友,到
现在他还是一样关心GEICO的情况,而当公司现任的主管-Jack Byrne、Bill
Snnder与Tony有任何需要他的地方,他都会随时挺身相助,虽然这次的并购
案将使得戴维必须承担大笔的税负,但他还是一样支持这项交易。

Davy has been one of my heroes for the 45 years I've known

him, and he's never let me down. You should understand that

Berkshire would not be where it is today if Davy had not been so

generous with his time on a cold Saturday in 1951. I've often

thanked him privately, but it is fitting that I use this report

to thank him on behalf of Berkshire's shareholders.

自从我认识戴维后,45年以来他一直就是我崇拜的偶像之一,而他确实也从未
让我失望过,大家必须了解如果没有戴维在1951年那个寒冷的星期六慷慨解
说,Berkshire就绝对不可能会有今天的成就,多年来私底下,我已不知感谢他
多少次了,但是今天在这里我觉得应该借着今年的年报代替Berkshire所有的股
东向他致上深深的感谢之意。

Insurance Operations

保险事业营运

In addition to acquiring GEICO, we enjoyed other favorable

developments in insurance during 1995.

除了取得GEICO保险公司全部的股权,1995年我们其它保险事业也都有相当
不错的发展。

As we've explained in past reports, what counts in our

insurance business is, first, the amount of "float" we generate

and, second, its cost to us. Float is money we hold but don't

own. In an insurance operation, float arises because most

policies require that premiums be prepaid and, more importantly,

because it usually takes time for an insurer to hear about and

resolve loss claims.

就像我们在过去年报跟各位解释过的,保险事业最重要的关键,第一是保险浮存
金的数量,第二是它的成本,浮存金是我们持有并非我们所有,保险事业营运之
所以能有浮存金的原因在于大部分的保单都会要求保户必须预付保险费,另外更
重要的是保险公司在被知会并真正理赔之前,通常都要经过好长的一段时间。

Typically, the premiums that an insurer takes in do not

cover the losses and expenses it must pay. That leaves it

running an "underwriting loss" - and that loss is the cost of

float. An insurance business is profitable over time if its cost

of float is less than the cost the company would otherwise incur

to obtain funds. But the business has a negative value if the

cost of its float is higher than market rates for money.

通常保险公司实际上收到的保费并不足以支应实际发生的损失与费用,所以大多
会产生承保的损失,而这就是浮存金的成本,长期而言,保险公司的浮存金成本
若能低于其它资金管道所需的成本就算是获利,但是要是其浮存金成本高于货币
市场利率的话,其是否有存在的价值就有疑问。

As the numbers in the following table show, Berkshire's

insurance business has been a huge winner. For the table, we

have calculated our float - which we generate in exceptional

amounts relative to our premium volume - by adding loss reserves,

loss adjustment reserves, funds held under reinsurance assumed

and unearned premium reserves, and then subtracting agents'

balances, prepaid acquisition costs, prepaid taxes and deferred

charges applicable to assumed reinsurance. Our cost of float is

determined by our underwriting loss or profit. In those years

when we have had an underwriting profit, such as the last three,

our cost of float has been negative, which means we have

calculated our insurance earnings by adding underwriting profit

to float income.

如同下表中的数字所显示的,Berkshire的保险事业大获全胜,表中的浮存金,
系将所有的损失准备、损失费用调整准备与未赚取保费加总后,再扣除应付佣
金、预付购并成本及相关再保递延费用,相对于我们的保费收入总额,我们的浮
存金部位算是相当大的,至于浮存金的成本则决定于所发生的承保损失或利益而
定,在某些年度由于我们有承保利益,所以换句话说,我们的资金成本甚至是负
的,此时我们的保险事业盈余等于是由原先从浮存金获取的利益再加上承保利
益。

(1) (2) Yearend Yield

Underwriting Approximate on Long-Term

Loss Average Float Cost of Funds Govt. Bonds

------------ ------------- --------------- -------------

(In $ Millions) (Ratio of 1 to 2)

1967 ...... profit 17.3 less than zero 5.50%

1968 ...... profit 19.9 less than zero 5.90%

1969 ...... profit 23.4 less than zero 6.79%

1970 ...... 0.37 32.4 1.14% 6.25%

1971 ...... profit 52.5 less than zero 5.81%

1972 ...... profit 69.5 less than zero 5.82%

1973 ...... profit 73.3 less than zero 7.27%

1974 ...... 7.36 79.1 9.30% 8.13%

1975 ...... 11.35 87.6 12.96% 8.03%

1976 ...... profit 102.6 less than zero 7.30%

1977 ...... profit 139.0 less than zero 7.97%

1978 ...... profit 190.4 less than zero 8.93%

1979 ...... profit 227.3 less than zero 10.08%

1980 ...... profit 237.0 less than zero 11.94%

1981 ...... profit 228.4 less than zero 13.61%

1982 ...... 21.56 220.6 9.77% 10.64%

1983 ...... 33.87 231.3 14.64% 11.84%

1984 ...... 48.06 253.2 18.98% 11.58%

1985 ...... 44.23 390.2 11.34% 9.34%

1986 ...... 55.84 797.5 7.00% 7.60%

1987 ...... 55.43 1,266.7 4.38% 8.95%

1988 ...... 11.08 1,497.7 0.74% 9.00%

1989 ...... 24.40 1,541.3 1.58% 7.97%

1990 ...... 26.65 1,637.3 1.63% 8.24%

1991 ...... 119.59 1,895.0 6.31% 7.40%

1992 ...... 108.96 2,290.4 4.76% 7.39%

1993 ...... profit 2,624.7 less than zero 6.35%

1994 ...... profit 3,056.6 less than zero 7.88%

1995 ...... profit 3,607.2 less than zero 5.95%

Since 1967, when we entered the insurance business, our float

has grown at an annual compounded rate of 20.7%. In more years

than not, our cost of funds has been less than nothing. This

access to "free" money has boosted Berkshire's performance in a

major way.

自从1967年我们进军保险业以来,我们的浮存金每年以20.7%复合成长率增
加,大部分的年度,我们的资金成本都低于零以下,受惠于这些免费的资金,大
大地帮助Berkshire的绩效提升。

Any company's level of profitability is determined by three

items: (1) what its assets earn; (2) what its liabilities cost;

and (3) its utilization of "leverage" - that is, the degree to

which its assets are funded by liabilities rather than by equity.

Over the years, we have done well on Point 1, having produced high

returns on our assets. But we have also benefitted greatly - to a

degree that is not generally well-understood - because our

liabilities have cost us very little. An important reason for this

low cost is that we have obtained float on very advantageous terms.

The same cannot be said by many other property and casualty

insurers, who may generate plenty of float, but at a cost that

exceeds what the funds are worth to them. In those circumstances,

leverage becomes a disadvantage.

任何一家公司的获利能力决定于(1)资产报酬率(2)负债的成本(3)财务杠杆的运
用-也就是其运用负债而非股东权益来支应资产取得的程度。多年以来,我们在
第一项表现的相当不错,运用资产所产生的报酬很高,然而在另外一方面由于资
金成本极低,也使得我们受惠不少,这点就比较不为人所知,资金成本之所以可
以压得很低,主要是由于我们可以用很有利的条件取得保险浮存金,关于这点在
其它同业身上就不敢说了,通常他们也能取得大量的保险浮存金,但是取得的成
本可能远超过应该付的代价,在这种状况下,运用财务杠杆反而变得相当不利。

Since our float has cost us virtually nothing over the years,

it has in effect served as equity. Of course, it differs from true

equity in that it doesn't belong to us. Nevertheless, let's assume

that instead of our having $3.4 billion of float at the end of

1994, we had replaced it with $3.4 billion of equity. Under this

scenario, we would have owned no more assets than we did during

1995. We would, however, have had somewhat lower earnings because

the cost of float was negative last year. That is, our float threw

off profits. And, of course, to obtain the replacement equity, we

would have needed to sell many new shares of Berkshire. The net

result - more shares, equal assets and lower earnings - would have

materially reduced the value of our stock. So you can understand

why float wonderfully benefits a business - if it is obtained at a

low cost.

由于多年来这些保险浮存金几乎没有让我们增加任何额外的成本,所以它们实际
上等同于股本,当然不同于真正的股本,这些资金并不真正属于我们,不过假设
在1994年我们持有的不是34亿美元的浮存金,而是34亿美元的股本的话,
在这种情况下,我们拥有的总资产一点都不会增加,而且我们的盈余却可能还会
不增反减,因为去年浮存金的成本是负的,也就是说浮存金的存在对于我们的获
利还有额外的贡献,而资本的增加却代表着Berkshire必须额外再发行许多新
股,所以想当然尔,更多的股份代表着更低的每股盈余,等于大大地减损了每股
股份的价值,所以大家应该能够了解,为什么浮存金对于一个企业来说如此的重
要,尤其是当它们取得的成本极低之时。

Our acquisition of GEICO will immediately increase our float

by nearly $3 billion, with additional growth almost certain. We

also expect GEICO to operate at a decent underwriting profit in

most years, a fact that will increase the probability that our

total float will cost us nothing. Of course, we paid a very

substantial price for the GEICO float, whereas virtually all of the

gains in float depicted in the table were developed internally.

在购并GEICO之后,我们的保险浮存金马上增加近30亿美元,而且展望未来
这数字还会继续成长,此外我们也预期GEICO每年还能够继续拥有相当的承保
获利,这等于保证这些浮存金不但不须负担资金成本还能额外贡献给我们获利,
当然就内部转拨而言,我们还是必须支付GEICO一笔相当的对价以取得浮存
金。

Our enthusiasm over 1995's insurance results must be tempered

once again because we had our third straight year of good fortune

in the super-cat business. In this operation, we sell policies

that insurance and reinsurance companies buy to protect themselves

from the effects of mega-catastrophes. Since truly major

catastrophes occur infrequently, our super-cat business can be

expected to show large profits in most years but occasionally to

record a huge loss. In other words, the attractiveness of our

super-cat business will take many years to measure. We know that

the results of years like the past three will be at least partially

offset by some truly terrible year in the future. We just hope

that "partially" turns out to be the proper adverb.

对于1995年我们的保险营运绩效的兴奋程度可能要再度稍微降温一下,原因在
于我们的霹雳猫再保业务连续第三年大放异彩,我们出售保单给保险公司与再保
公司以分散其面临超大型意外灾害所可能承担的风险,由于真正重大的灾害并不
常发生,所以我们的霹雳猫业务有可能在连续几年赚大钱后,才突然发生重大的
损失,换句话说,我们这项霹雳猫业务到底有多吸引人可能要花上好几年才有办
法看得清,我们很清楚的了解过去三年来优异的成果一定会被未来某些悲惨的年
度给抵消掉部份的效果,当然我们希望所谓的"部份"是个适当的形容词。

There were plenty of catastrophes last year, but no super-cats

of the insured variety. The Southeast had a close call when Opal,

sporting winds of 150 miles per hour, hovered off Florida.

However, the storm abated before hitting land, and so a second

Andrew was dodged. For insurers, the Kobe earthquake was another

close call: The economic damage was huge - perhaps even a record -

but only a tiny portion of it was insured. The insurance industry

won't always be that lucky.

去年天灾不断,但没有一个?越霹雳猫的界限,曾有一个强风Opal在美国东南
部以每小时150英哩的速度徘徊在佛罗里达附近,所幸它在登陆前及时转弱,
而避免成为第二个Andrew飓风,另外对保险公司来说,阪神大地震同样令人
印象深刻,不可讳言,那次造成的总体经济损失可算是空前,不过由于其中仅有
一小部份有保险,所以最后真正保险理赔的金额有限,当然保险业不可能永远都
那么幸运。

Ajit Jain is the guiding genius of our super-cat business and

writes important non-cat business as well. In insurance, the term

"catastrophe" is applied to an event, such as a hurricane or

earthquake, that causes a great many insured losses. The other

deals Ajit enters into usually cover only a single large loss. A

simplified description of three transactions from last year will

illustrate both what I mean and Ajit's versatility. We insured: (1)

The life of Mike Tyson for a sum that is large initially and that,

fight-by-fight, gradually declines to zero over the next few years;

(2) Lloyd's against more than 225 of its "names" dying during the

year; and (3) The launch, and a year of orbit, of two Chinese

satellites. Happily, both satellites are orbiting, the Lloyd's folk

avoided abnormal mortality, and if Mike Tyson looked any healthier,

no one would get in the ring with him.

Ajit Jain可说是我们霹雳猫业务的天纵英才,当然他同时也负责许多重要的非霹
雳猫业务,在保险业所谓的灾害,系指可能导致许多理赔损失的事件,诸如飓风
或地震等,另外Ajit也负责受理一些单一重大事件的投保,以下三件个案应该
可充分以说明我所说的意思,同时展现Ajit的多才多艺,我们受理(1)拳王泰森
的生命险,当然一开始金额相当的高,但随着一场场的比赛在几年后逐渐递减到
最后变成零(2)英国最大保险劳埃氏总计225人的生命险以及(3)保证两颗中国
卫星的发射及在轨道上周转一年;结果所幸中国卫星发射顺利,并在轨道上正常
运转,同时劳埃氏的死亡率还算正常,而拳王泰森看起来再健康不过,看不出有
谁可以从他手上抢下冠军戒指。

Berkshire is sought out for many kinds of insurance, both

super-cat and large single-risk, because: (1) our financial

strength is unmatched, and insureds know we can and will pay our

losses under the most adverse of circumstances; (2) we can supply a

quote faster than anyone in the business; and (3) we will issue

policies with limits larger than anyone else is prepared to write.

Most of our competitors have extensive reinsurance treaties and

lay off much of their business. While this helps them avoid shock

losses, it also hurts their flexibility and reaction time. As you

know, Berkshire moves quickly to seize investment and acquisition

opportunities; in insurance we respond with the same exceptional

speed. In another important point, large coverages don't frighten

us but, on the contrary, intensify our interest. We have offered a

policy under which we could have lost $1 billion; the largest

coverage that a client accepted was $400 million.

Berkshire目前积极寻求各类保险业务,包含霹雳猫与大型单一风险,因为(1)
我们无与伦比的财务实力,使得投保客户可以确定不论在多糟的状况下,他们都
可以顺利获得理赔(2)我们可以最快的速度向客户完成报价(3)我们可以签下比其
他保险公司金额更高的保单,其它竞争同业大多都有范围广阔的再保条款,并将
大部分的业务分保出去,虽然这样的做法可以让他们避免重大的损失意外,但却
也破坏掉他们的弹性与反应时间,大家都知道,Berkshire抓住投资与购并的动
作向来相当的快,在保险业务方面我们的反应速度也是如此,另外还有很重要的
一点,高额的保险上限吓唬不了我们,相反地更能引起我们的兴趣,我们可以接
受的最高理赔上限是10亿美元,相较之下,其它同业所能容忍的最高限度仅为
4亿美元。

We will get hit from time to time with large losses. Charlie

and I, however, are quite willing to accept relatively volatile

results in exchange for better long-term earnings than we would

otherwise have had. In other words, we prefer a lumpy 15% to a

smooth 12%. Since most managers opt for smoothness, we are left

with a competitive advantage that we try to maximize. We do,

though, monitor our aggregate exposure in order to keep our "worst

case" at a level that leaves us comfortable.

总有一天我们会碰上大麻烦,但是查理跟我本人却相当可以接受这种变动剧烈的
结局,只要长期来说我们的报酬可以令人满意,讲的再白一点,我们比较喜欢上
下变动的15%,更甚于平淡无奇的12%,而正因为大部分的经理人倾向平淡,
这使得我们长期报酬极大化的目标享有绝对的竞争优势,当然我们会密切注意避
免让最坏的状况超越我们可以容忍的范围。

Indeed, our worst case from a "once-in-a-century" super-cat is

far less severe - relative to net worth - than that faced by many

well-known primary companies writing great numbers of property

policies. These insurers don't issue single huge-limit policies as

we do, but their small policies, in aggregate, can create a risk of

staggering size. The "big one" would blow right through the

reinsurance covers of some of these insurers, exposing them to

uncapped losses that could threaten their survival. In our case,

losses would be large, but capped at levels we could easily handle.

事实上,即使是发生百年一次的超级大灾难的最坏情况下,我们净值所可能受到
的损害程度可以远比其它签下一大堆产物意外险保单的知名保险业者要来的轻
微许多,虽然这些同业没有像我们一样签下单一极高上限的保单,但是所谓积沙
成塔,他们累积的小额保单却可能造成无以弥补的后果,因为后者可能会直接穿
越再保险的防护罩,使他们必须承担没有上限的损失与生存的危机,至于我们,
损失数字虽然很大,但却是在我们可以轻易化解的范围之内。

Prices are weakening in the super-cat field. That is

understandable considering the influx of capital into the

reinsurance business a few years ago and the natural desire of

those holding the capital to employ it. No matter what others may

do, we will not knowingly write business at inadequate rates. We

unwittingly did this in the early 1970's and, after more than 20

years, regularly receive significant bills stemming from the

mistakes of that era. My guess is that we will still be getting

surprises from that business 20 years from now. A bad reinsurance

contract is like hell: easy to enter and impossible to exit.

近年来霹雳猫保单的价格一直萎糜不振,这点可以理解的原因在于几年前大量的
资金流进再保业界竞逐有限的保单生意,然而不管别人怎么做,我们是绝对不会
以不合理的价格赔钱做生意的,早在1970年代初期,我们就一直在不知情的情
况下,犯下类似的错误,结果在往后的二十年内,因为那个年代错误所付出的代
价,化成理赔损失的账单不断地涌进本公司,而我有预感我们将会为20年前所
犯的错误继续付出代价,一张糟糕的再保合约就像是地狱一样,进去容易,但想
要出来可就难了。

I actively participated in those early reinsurance decisions,

and Berkshire paid a heavy tuition for my education in the

business. Unfortunately, reinsurance students can't attend school

on scholarship. GEICO, incidentally, suffered a similar,

disastrous experience in the early 1980's, when it plunged

enthusiastically into the writing of reinsurance and large risks.

GEICO's folly was brief, but it will be cleaning things up for at

least another decade. The well-publicized problems at Lloyd's

further illustrate the perils of reinsurance and also underscore

how vital it is that the interests of the people who write

insurance business be aligned - on the downside as well as the

upside - with those of the people putting up the capital. When

that kind of symmetry is missing, insurers almost invariably run

into trouble, though its existence may remain hidden for some time.

早年我积极参与再保业务,结果使得Berkshire必须为我这一堂课付出昂贵的学
费,更不幸的是,修再保课程的学生根本没有办法拿到奖学金,碰巧的是GEICO
在1980年代初期,也面临过类似悲惨的命运,当时该公司一头热地栽进再保与
大型灾害保险的业务,虽然GEICO愚昧的举动为期不久,但是它却必须花费十
年以上的工夫收拾残局,著名的英国劳埃氏保险的困境进一步说明了不当再保可
能造成的灾难以及共同投入资金参与保险业务出资人的利益,基本上就是一个生
命共同体,不管是在顺境与逆境皆然,一旦人们失去对于这点观念的聚焦,保险
业者就注定会发生问题,而且通常必须经历一段时间后,问题才会逐渐地浮上台
面。

A small, apocryphal story about an insurance CEO who was

visited by an analyst tells a lot about this industry. To the

analyst's questions about his business, the CEO had nothing but

gloomy answers: Rates were ridiculously low; the reserves on his

balance sheet weren't adequate for ordinary claims, much less those

likely to arise from asbestos and environmental problems; most of

his reinsurers had long since gone broke, leaving him holding the

sack. But then the CEO brightened: "Still, things could be a lot

worse," he said. "It could be my money." At Berkshire, it's our

money.

有一段小故事是有关一位保险公司总裁接受一位分析师访问谈到保险业的经
营,面对分析师询问关于其公司的情况时,得到的答案显得相当无奈,费率低得
离谱、财务报表上所提的准备连一般理赔都不够,更不要说其它那些因为石绵与
环保问题所引发的重大损害赔偿,想到许多以往依靠的再保公司都已倒闭,只剩
他一个人独撑大局,突然间这位总裁略微释怀的说到,当然情况有可能会更糟,
再来可能就会轮到我的荷包,天啊!在Berkshire,这可是我们的荷包呢!

Berkshire's other insurance operations, though relatively

small, performed magnificently in 1995. National Indemnity's

traditional business had a combined ratio of 84.2 and developed, as

usual, a large amount of float compared to premium volume. Over

the last three years, this segment of our business, run by Don Wurster, has had an average combined ratio of 85.6. Our homestate

operation, managed by Rod Eldred, grew at a good rate in 1995 and

achieved a combined ratio of 81.4. Its three-year combined ratio

is an amazing 82.4. Berkshire's California workers' compensation

business, run by Brad Kinstler, faced fierce price-cutting in 1995

and lost a great many renewals when we refused to accept inadequate

rates. Though this operation's volume dropped materially, it

produced an excellent underwriting profit. Finally, John Kizer, at

Central States Indemnity, continues to do an extraordinary job.

His premium volume was up 23% in 1995, and underwriting profit grew

by 59%. Ajit, Don, Rod, Brad and John are all under 45, an

embarrassing fact demolishing my theory that managers only hit

their stride after they reach 70.

Berkshire其它的保险营运,虽然规模相对较小,但在1995年的表现却同样极
为出色,国家产物保险传统业务的综合比率只有84.2,同时以其保费收入来看,
还贡献了大量的浮存金,过去三年以来,这个由Don Wurster负责的部门平均
的综合比率只有85.6;另外由Rod Eldred负责的Homestate业务也有相当幅
度的成长,去年的综合比率更只有81.4,过去三年平均为82.4;由Brad负责
的加州劳工退休基金在1995年面对激烈的价格竞争,同时还因为拒绝不合理的
降价要求而失去续约的机会,虽然此举使得业务量大幅缩减,但整体的承保利益
仍然相当可观;最后负责中央州立产险公司营运的John则依然表现出色,1995
年的保费收入成长23%,承保利益更大幅增加59%,Ajit、Don、Rod、Brad
与John的年纪都在45岁以下,这种情况也让我以往认为经理人要到70之后
才能随心所欲的论点破功。

To sum up, we entered 1995 with an exceptional insurance

operation of moderate size. By adding GEICO, we entered 1996 with

a business still better in quality, much improved in its growth

prospects, and doubled in size. More than ever, insurance is our

core strength.

总的来说,1995年我们规模适中的保险事业缴出漂亮的成绩单,而展望1996
年,在GEICO加入之后,在维持保险事业原有的品质之下,规模与成长皆可期,
较之以往,保险事业已成为我们核心竞争事业。

Sources of Reported Earnings

帐列盈余的来源

The table below shows the main sources of Berkshire's reported

earnings. In this presentation, purchase-premium charges are not

assigned to the specific businesses to which they apply, but are

instead aggregated and shown separately. This procedure lets you

view the earnings of our businesses as they would have been

reported had we not purchased them. This form of presentation

seems to us to be more useful to investors and managers than one

utilizing GAAP, which requires purchase-premiums to be charged off,

business-by-business. The total earnings we show in the table are,

of course, identical to the GAAP total in our audited financial

statements.

下表显示Berkshire帐列盈余的主要来源,在这张表中商誉的摊销数与购买法会
计调整数会从个别被投资公司分离出来,单独加总列示,之所以这样做是为了让
旗下各事业的盈余状况,不因我们的投资而有所影响,过去我一再地强调我们认
为这样的表达方式,较之一般公认会计原则要求以个别企业基础做调整,不管是
对投资者或是管理者来说,更有帮助,当然最后损益加总的数字仍然会与经会计
师查核的数字一致。

(in millions)

---------------------------------------

Berkshire's Share

of Net Earnings

(after taxes and

Pre-Tax Earnings minority interests)

------------------ ------------------

1995 1994 1995 1994

-------- -------- -------- --------

Operating Earnings:

Insurance Group:

Underwriting ............... $ 20.5 $129.9 $ 11.3 $ 80.9

Net Investment Income ...... 501.6 419.4 417.7 350.5

Buffalo News ................. 46.8 54.2 27.3 31.7

Fechheimer ................... 16.9 14.3 8.8 7.1

Finance Businesses ........... 20.8 22.1 12.6 14.6

Home Furnishings ............. 29.7(1) 17.4 16.7(1) 8.7

Jewelry ...................... 33.9(2) ---(3) 19.1(2) ---(3)

Kirby ........................ 50.2 42.3 32.1 27.7

Scott Fetzer Manufacturing Group 34.1 39.5 21.2 24.9

See's Candies ................ 50.2 47.5 29.8 28.2

Shoe Group ................... 58.4 85.5 37.5 55.8

World Book ................... 8.8 24.7 7.0 17.3

Purchase-Price Premium Charges (27.0) (22.6) (23.4) (19.4)

Interest Expense(4) .......... (56.0) (60.1) (34.9) (37.3)

Shareholder-Designated

Contributions ............ (11.6) (10.4) (7.0) (6.7)

Other ........................ 37.4 35.7 24.4 22.3

-------- -------- -------- --------

Operating Earnings ............. 814.7 839.4 600.2 606.2

Sales of Securities ............ 194.1 91.3 125.0 61.1

Decline in Value of

USAir Preferred Stock ...... --- (268.5) --- (172.6)

--------- -------- -------- --------

Total Earnings - All Entities $1,008.8 $662.2 $725.2 $494.8

======= ======= ====== ======

(1) Includes R.C. Willey from June 29, 1995.
(1)包含R.C. Willey 1995年6月29日以后的盈余

(2) Includes Helzberg's from April 30, 1995.
(2)包含Helzberg 1995年4月30日以后的盈余

(3) Jewelry earnings were included in "Other" in 1994.

(3)珠宝事业1994年的盈余包含在其它项目之下

(4) Excludes interest expense of Finance Businesses.

(4)扣除金融事业的利息支出

A large amount of information about these businesses is given

on pages 41-52, where you will also find our segment earnings

reported on a GAAP basis. In addition, on pages 57-63, we have

rearranged Berkshire's financial data into four segments on a non-

GAAP basis, a presentation that corresponds to the way Charlie and

I think about the company. Our intent is to supply you with the

financial information that we would wish you to give us if our

positions were reversed.

在年报中你可以找到依照一般公认会计原则编制,详细的部门别信息,至于我们
的目的是希望能够给大家,所有查理跟我认为在评估Berkshire价值时,应该必
要的信息。

At Berkshire, we believe in Charlie's dictum - "Just tell me

the bad news; the good news will take care of itself" - and that is

the behavior we expect of our managers when they are reporting to

us. Consequently, I also owe you - Berkshire's owners - a report

on three operations that, though they continued to earn decent (or

better) returns on invested capital, experienced a decline in

earnings last year. Each encountered a different type of problem.

在Berkshire,我们相信查理的格言,只管告诉我坏消息,因为好消息绝对会不
胫而走,而这也是我们希望旗下事业经理人向我们报告时所采取的态度,也因此
身为Berkshire负责人的我有义务向大家报告,去年总共有三个事业营运发生问
题,虽然投资在他们身上的资金所取得的报酬率仍然相当的不错(或甚至是更
好),但每个事业都面临了不同的问题。

Our shoe business operated in an industry that suffered

depressed earnings throughout last year, and many of our

competitors made only marginal profits or worse. That means we at

least maintained, and in some instances widened, our competitive

superiority. So I have no doubt that our shoe operations will

climb back to top-grade earnings in the future. In other words,

though the turn has not yet occurred, we believe you should view

last year's figures as reflecting a cyclical problem, not a secular

one.

去年一整年我们的鞋类事业一直面临产业困境,有些同业只能勉强赚取蝇头小
利,甚至是亏钱,当然这也代表在某个层面来说,至少我们与同业间仍维持着甚
至是扩大了竞争差距,所以我依然坚信在未来,我们的鞋类事业一定能够回复以
往的高获利,换句话说,虽然目前尚未看到反转的迹象,但我认为大家可以将去
年的数字视为景气即将反转的底部,而不是永远的谷底。

The Buffalo News, though still doing very well in comparison

to other newspapers, is another story. In this case, industry

trends are not good. In the 1991 Annual Report, I explained that

newspapers had lost a notch in their economic attractiveness from

the days when they appeared to have a bullet-proof franchise.

Today, the industry retains its excellent economics, but has lost

still another notch. Over time, we expect the competitive strength

of newspapers to gradually erode, though the industry should

nevertheless remain a fine business for many years to come.

至于水牛城新闻报的表现,较之同业虽然还是相当不错,却也面临另外的问题,
那就是报业前景不佳,在1991年的年报中,我就曾说过报业早已失去以往金刚
不摧的特许事业所享有的竞争优势,虽然时至今日,报业经营还算稳定,但却逐
渐失去另一项竞争优势,我们预期报业的竞争力将与日剧减,虽然这产业在未来
可见的年度内还是一项不错的投资。

Berkshire's most difficult problem is World Book, which

operates in an industry beset by increasingly tough competition

from CD-ROM and on-line offerings. True, we are still profitable,

a claim that perhaps no other print encyclopedia can make. But our

sales and earnings trends have gone in the wrong direction. At the

end of 1995, World Book made major changes in the way it

distributes its product, stepped up its efforts with electronic

products and sharply reduced its overhead costs. It will take time

for us to evaluate the effects of these initiatives, but we are

confident they will significantly improve our viability.

在Berkshire目前状况最多的就属世界百科全书,面临来自CD与网络激烈的竞
争,虽然我们仍能勉强维持获利,(大概没有其它百科全书业者敢这样说),不过
业绩与获利却直线下滑,因此在1995年底,世界百科全书决定大幅改变行销方
式,加强电子产品内容并大幅降低营运成本,当然这些做法的成效还有待观察,
不过我个人相信此举绝对有助于我们继续维持生存。

All of our operations, including those whose earnings fell

last year, benefit from exceptionally talented and dedicated

managers. Were we to have the choice of any other executives now

working in their industries, there is not one of our managers we

would replace.

我们旗下所有的事业,也包含几个获利大幅衰退的公司,一直都由杰出专注的经
理人所经营,就算我们有机会能够挖到业界最好的经理人,但我们还是不会考虑
将给他们取代掉。

Many of our managers don't have to work for a living, but

simply go out and perform every day for the same reason that

wealthy golfers stay on the tour: They love both doing what they

do and doing it well. To describe them as working may be a

misnomer - they simply prefer spending much of their time on a

productive activity at which they excel to spending it on leisure

activities. Our job is to provide an environment that will keep

them feeling this way, and so far we seem to have succeeded:

Thinking back over the 1965-95 period, I can't recall that a single

key manager has left Berkshire to join another employer.

我们有许多经理人根本就不必靠这份工作过活,但每天还是一样全力以赴,就像
是口袋麦克麦克的职业高尔夫球选手还是继续打巡回赛一样,他们喜欢现在从事
的工作,而且把它做的很好,把他们形容是在工作或许是个错误的名词,他们只
不过是把他们大部分的时间花在他们所擅长的生产活动而非休闲活动之上而
已,而我的工作则是努力维持一个让他们有这样感觉的环境,截至目前为止,我
们做的还算是相当成功,回顾过去1965年到1995年这三十年间,Berkshire
没有任何一位主要经理人发生琵琶别抱的情况。

Common Stock Investments

股票投资

Below we present our common stock investments. Those with a

market value of more than $600 million are itemized.

下表是我们超过六亿美元以上的普通股投资。

12/31/95

Shares Company Cost Market

---------- ------- -------- --------

(dollars in millions)

49,456,900 American Express Company ............. $1,392.7 $2,046.3

20,000,000 Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. ............. 345.0 2,467.5

100,000,000 The Coca-Cola Company ................ 1,298.9 7,425.0

12,502,500 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.

("Freddie Mac") ................... 260.1 1,044.0

34,250,000 GEICO Corp. .......................... 45.7 2,393.2

48,000,000 The Gillette Company ................. 600.0 2,502.0

6,791,218 Wells Fargo & Company ................ 423.7 1,466.9

Others ............................... 1,379.0 2,655.4

-------- ---------

Total Common Stocks .................. $5,745.1 $22,000.3

======= =======

We continue in our Rip Van Winkle mode: Five of our six top

positions at yearend 1994 were left untouched during 1995. The

sixth was American Express, in which we increased our ownership to

about 10%.

我们继续做着我们的李伯大梦,在1994年持有的前六大持股中,有五支在1995
年维持不动,唯一有变动的是美国运通,我们将持有股权比例提高到10%左右。

In early 1996, two major events affected our holdings: First,

our purchase of the GEICO stock we did not already own caused that

company to be converted into a wholly-owned subsidiary. Second, we

exchanged our Cap Cities shares for a combination of cash and

Disney stock.

在1996年初期,有两个重大事件影响到我们的持股,首先在买下GEICO剩余
一半的股份之后,GEICO变成我们百分之百持有的子公司,第二,我们将资本
城股份转换成现金与迪斯尼股票。

In the Disney merger, Cap Cities shareholders had a choice of

actions. If they chose, they could exchange each of their Cap

Cities shares for one share of Disney stock plus $65. Or they

could ask for - though not necessarily get - all cash or all stock,

with their ultimate allotment of each depending on the choices made

by other shareholders and certain decisions made by Disney. For

our 20 million shares, we sought stock, but do not know, as this

report goes to press, how much we were allocated. We are certain,

however, to receive something over 20 million Disney shares. We

have also recently bought Disney stock in the market.

在迪斯尼的并购案中,原来资本城的股东可以有好几种选择,他们可以选择将原
有一股转换成迪斯尼的一股外加65美元现金,或者他们可以要求全部换成现金
或是股票,但是最终可获得的分配结果还要视其它股东的选择以及迪斯尼本身的
态度而定,以我们持有2,000万股来说,我们选择全部转换成股票,不过到年
报截止日为止,我们还不确定到底可以分配到多少股份,当然可以确定的是最后
收到的股数一定会超过2,000万股,除此之外,我们还透过公开市场继续收购
迪斯尼的股份。

One more bit of history: I first became interested in Disney

in 1966, when its market valuation was less than $90 million, even

though the company had earned around $21 million pre-tax in 1965

and was sitting with more cash than debt. At Disneyland, the $17

million Pirates of the Caribbean ride would soon open. Imagine my

excitement - a company selling at only five times rides!

再透露一点历史,我第一次对迪斯尼发生兴趣是在1966年,当时它的股票市值
还不到9,000万美元,虽然该公司在前一年度-1965年的税前净利是2,100万
美元,而且所拥有的现金甚至多过于负债,当时迪斯奈乐园斥资1,700万美元
的加勒比海海盗船才刚要开幕,而这家公司的卖价只不过是这艄海盗船的五倍!

Duly impressed, Buffett Partnership Ltd. bought a significant

amount of Disney stock at a split-adjusted price of 31?per share.

That decision may appear brilliant, given that the stock now sells

for $66. But your Chairman was up to the task of nullifying it:

In 1967 I sold out at 48?per share.

印象深刻的我,利用巴菲特合伙企业的资金,买进一大笔的股份,照分割调整后
的平均成本约31美元一股,这样的决定显然很正确,因为现在的股价大概是
66美元一股,各位的董事长却在1967年以每股48美元将这批股票卖出,使
得其效果大打折扣。

Oh well - we're happy to be once again a large owner of a

business with both unique assets and outstanding management.

不过还好,绕了半天,我们很高兴能够再度成为这家拥有独特资产与杰出管理阶
层公司的大股东。

Convertible Preferred Stocks

可转换特别股

As many of you will remember, Berkshire made five private

purchases of convertible preferred stocks during the 1987-91 period

and the time seems right to discuss their status. Here are the

particulars:

大家可能都还记得,Berkshire在1987年到1991年透过与公司私下协议的方
式,取得五种可转换特别股,现在的时机很适合来谈谈它们现在的状况,以下是
一些重点摘要。

Dividend Year of Market

Company Rate Purchase Cost Value

------- -------- -------- ------ --------

(dollars in millions)

Champion International Corp. ... 9 1/4% 1989 $300 $388(1)

First Empire State Corp. ....... 9% 1991 40 110

The Gillette Company ........... 8 3/4% 1989 600 2,502(2)

Salomon Inc .................... 9% 1987 700 728(3)

USAir Group, Inc. .............. 9 1/4% 1989 358 215

(1) Proceeds from sale of common we received through conversion in 1995.

(2) 12/31/95 value of common we received through conversion in 1991.

(3) Includes $140 we received in 1995 from partial redemption.

(1)系1995年转换为普通股后,出售股票的收入。

(2)系1991年转换为普通股后的股票市值。

(3)包含1995年收到部份赎回的1.4亿美元收入。

In each case we had the option of sticking with these

preferreds as fixed-income securities or converting them into

common stock. Initially, their value to us came primarily from

their fixed-income characteristics. The option we had to convert

was a kicker.

每一个案子我们都有权选择维持原来以固定收益证券为主的特别股形式或是将
它们转换成普通股,刚开始它们的价值主要来自于固定收益证券的特质,至于其
所附带的转换权利只不过具有加分的作用而已。

Our $300 million private purchase of American Express "Percs"

- described in the 1991 Annual Report - is not included in the

table because that security was a modified form of common stock

whose fixed-income characteristics contributed only a minor portion

of its initial value. Three years after we bought them, the Percs

automatically were converted to common stock. In contrast, the

five securities in the table were set to become common stocks only

if we wished them to - a crucial difference.

另外在1991年的年报中已经介绍过,我们透过私募所取得的美国运通Percs,
并未包含在本表之中,其原因主要是因为Percs事实上是一种普通股的修订版,
其固定收益的特性只占其原始价值的一小部份,在我们买下它们的三年后已经自
动转为美国运通的普通股,相对的,本表所提到的五种有价证券只有在我们有意
愿的状况下,才会转变成一般的普通股,基本上这之间有相当大的差异。

When we purchased our convertible securities, I told you that

we expected to earn after-tax returns from them that "moderately"

exceeded what we could earn from the medium-term fixed-income

securities they replaced. We beat this expectation - but only

because of the performance of a single issue. I also told you that

these securities, as a group, would "not produce the returns we can

achieve when we find a business with wonderful economic prospects."

Unfortunately, that prediction was fulfilled. Finally, I said

that "under almost any conditions, we expect these preferreds to

return us our money plus dividends." That's one I would like to

have back. Winston Churchill once said that "eating my words has

never given me indigestion." My assertion, however, that it was

almost impossible for us to lose money on our preferreds has caused

me some well-deserved heartburn.

当我们买进这些可转换证券时,我曾经跟各位提到我们预期这些投资的税后报酬
率应该可以略高于其所取代的中期固定收益证券,幸运的是结果超乎预期,原因
是因为其中有一个案子发了,同时我也提醒过各位,这些投资可能无法与真正找
到具有竞争优势好公司的投资相比,不幸的就这点而言,我一语中的,最后我还
说过,不论在任何状况下,我们完全可以预期这些投资一定能够回收本金再加上
股息,这句话我想要收回来,虽然英国前首相丘吉尔曾说过?把说过的话吞回
去,并不会让人消化不良,但是关于我说过"特别股一定不会让我们赔钱的这句
话"确实让我感到心痛。

Our best holding has been Gillette, which we told you from the

start was a superior business. Ironically, though, this is also

the purchase in which I made my biggest mistake - of a kind,

however, never recognized on financial statements.

其中表现最佳的是吉列特别股,从一开始我就跟各位说过这是一家相当好的公
司,不过讽刺的是,这也是我犯过的一个大错之一,虽然这项错误从未反应在财
务报表之上。

We paid $600 million in 1989 for Gillette preferred shares

that were convertible into 48 million (split-adjusted) common

shares. Taking an alternative route with the $600 million, I

probably could have purchased 60 million shares of common from the

company. The market on the common was then about $10.50, and given

that this would have been a huge private placement carrying

important restrictions, I probably could have bought the stock at a

discount of at least 5%. I can't be sure about this, but it's

likely that Gillette's management would have been just as happy to

have Berkshire opt for common.

我们在1989年以六亿美元取得吉列可转换特别股,之后并转换为4,800万股
吉列的普通股(分割调整后),然而要是当初我们选择直接投资该公司的普通股,
这笔钱将可以买到6,000万股,因为吉列当时每股的市价为10.5美元,而由于
那次的私募对于我们有诸多的限制条款,所以拿到5%左右的折扣应该不成问
题,我不知道这样说对不对,我认为当时要是我们选择直接以取得普通股的方式
投资,该公司的管理阶层可能会更高兴。

But I was far too clever to do that. Instead, for less than

two years, we received some extra dividend income (the difference

between the preferred's yield and that of the common), at which

point the company - quite properly - called the issue, moving to do

that as quickly as was possible. If I had negotiated for common

rather than preferred, we would have been better off at yearend

1995 by $625 million, minus the "excess" dividends of about $70

million.

可惜人算不如天算,虽然在这两年内我们另外还收到额外的特别股股息(这是普
通股所没有的),如果当初我选择普通股而非特别股的话,截至1995年止我们
将可多获得6.25亿美元的利益,当然还要再扣除7,000万美元的特别股股息。

In the case of Champion, the ability of the company to call

our preferred at 115% of cost forced a move out of us last August

that we would rather have delayed. In this instance, we converted

our shares just prior to the pending call and offered them to the

company at a modest discount.

另外在Champion这个案子,由于公司可以以115%的价位赎回我们持有的特
别股,使得我们被迫于去年八月有所动作,这个案子就在公司即将有权动用赎回
权的前夕,以略微打折的价格申请转换为普通股。

Charlie and I have never had a conviction about the paper

industry - actually, I can't remember ever owning the common stock

of a paper producer in my 54 years of investing - so our choice in

August was whether to sell in the market or to the company.

Champion's management had always been candid and honorable in

dealing with us and wished to repurchase common shares, so we

offered our stock to the company. Our Champion capital gain was

moderate - about 19% after tax from a six-year investment - but the

preferred delivered us a good after-tax dividend yield throughout

our holding period. (That said, many press accounts have

overstated the after-tax yields earned by property-casualty

insurance companies on dividends paid to them. What the press has

failed to take into account is a change in the tax law that took

effect in 1987 and that significantly reduced the dividends

received credit applicable to insurers. For details, see our 1986

Annual Report.)

查理跟我对造纸业从来没有涉猎,事实上在我长达54年的投资生涯中,印象中
从来就没有持有过纸类股的股票,所以去年八月我们可以做的选择大概就是将这
笔投资在市场上卖掉或是任由公司赎回,在我们投资Champion的过程中,该
公司经营阶层对我们的态度一向坦白自重,而他们也希望将这批股票买回,所以
到最后我们决定顺应公司的要求,这项举动让我们有19%的税后资本利得,当
然还要再加上持有六年期间所收到的特别股股息,(附带一提,许多新闻报导都
过度高估一般产物意外险业者所收到股利收入的税后报酬率,原因在于媒体记者
忘了将1987年通过的新税法列入考虑,这项税法大大减少了保险业者最后可以
得到的利益,相关的细节请参阅1986年的年报)。

Our First Empire preferred will be called on March 31, 1996,

the earliest date allowable. We are comfortable owning stock in

well-run banks, and we will convert and keep our First Empire

common shares. Bob Wilmers, CEO of the company, is an outstanding

banker, and we love being associated with him.

我们在第一帝国银行的特别股在1996年3月1日进行转换,这是可以转换的
最早日期,我们对于能够继续持有这家经营良好银行的股份感到相当安心,该公
司的总裁Bob Wilmers是位相当优秀的银行家,我们很高兴能够与他一起合
作。

Our other two preferreds have been disappointing, though the

Salomon preferred has modestly outperformed the fixed-income

securities for which it was a substitute. However, the amount of

management time Charlie and I have devoted to this holding has been

vastly greater than its economic significance to Berkshire.

Certainly I never dreamed I would take a new job at age 60 -

Salomon interim chairman, that is - because of an earlier purchase

of a fixed-income security.

另外两个特别股投资个案的结果就让人相当失望,虽然所罗门特别股最后的投资
报酬率仍高于其替代的固定收益证券投资,不过若考量查理跟我本人在这项投资
上所花费的心思,其所得与付出实在是不成正比,当然我根本就没有料到到了
60岁的这把年纪,会因为一笔固定收益证券的投资,还能够接下这项担任所罗
门临时董事会主席的新工作。

Soon after our purchase of the Salomon preferred in 1987, I

wrote that I had "no special insights regarding the direction or

future profitability of investment banking." Even the most

charitable commentator would conclude that I have since proved my

point.

1987年就在我们刚刚买下所罗门特别股不久之后,我就曾经说过我们对于投资
银行业的发展前景与获利能力并没有特殊的见地,我想事后看来就算是最好心的
评论家,也会觉得我当时说的那段话很有道理。

To date, our option to convert into Salomon common has not

proven of value. Furthermore, the Dow Industrials have doubled

since I committed to buy the preferred, and the brokerage group has

performed equally as well. That means my decision to go with

Salomon because I saw value in the conversion option must be graded

as very poor. Even so, the preferred has continued under some

trying conditions to deliver as a fixed-income security, and the

9% dividend is currently quite attractive.

到目前为止,我们拥有将这笔投资转换为所罗门普通股的权利,其价值尚未浮
现,另外自从买进这笔投资后,道琼指数已经涨了一倍,而券商的表现也相当不
错,这代表我因为判断转换权利相当有价值而决定继续与所罗门交往的决策品质
相当的差,不过即便如此,这笔特别股投资还是相当勉力地继续当作我们的固定
收益证券投资,毕竟每年9%的股息收入还是相当诱人的。

Unless the preferred is converted, its terms require

redemption of 20% of the issue on October 31 of each year, 1995-99,

and $140 million of our original $700 million was taken on schedule

last year. (Some press reports labeled this a sale, but a senior

security that matures is not "sold.") Though we did not elect to

convert the preferred that matured last year, we have four more

bites at the conversion apple, and I believe it quite likely that

we will yet find value in our right to convert.

除非我们选择转换,否则这项投资有一条款约定从1995年10月31日开始的
五年,该公司每年都可赎回20%的投资,所以去年我们总计7亿的投资中,1.4
亿已按计划由公司赎回,(有些新闻报导将这笔交易称呼为出售,事实上债券到
期后应该称之为"赎回"),虽然去年我们放弃转换选择而被赎回,不过我们还有四
次机会,而我也相信未来我们应该很有可能在这些转换的权利中找到一些价值存
在。

I discussed the USAir investment at length in last year's

report. The company's results improved in 1995, but it still faces

significant problems. On the plus side for us is the fact that our

preferred is structurally well-designed: For example, though we

have not been paid dividends since June 1994, the amounts owed us

are compounding at 5% over the prime rate. On the minus side is

the fact that we are dealing with a weak credit.

去年我花了相当大的篇幅讨论美国航空,这家公司今年的表现略微好转,不过还
是着面临许多的问题,幸运的是我们的特别股投资条款当初订的对我们较有利,
比如说,虽然从1994年起本来应该付给我们的特别股股息就已跳票,但是欠我
们的股息每年还是必须以5%的基放利率加计利息,不过不幸的是跟我们打交道
的是一家债信不良的公司。

We feel much better about our USAir preferred than we did a

year ago, but your guess is as good as mine as to its ultimate

value. (Indeed, considering my record with this investment, it's

fair to say that your guess may be better than mine.) At yearend

we carried our preferred (in which there is no public market) at

60% of par, though USAir also has outstanding a junior preferred

that is significantly inferior to ours in all respects except

conversion price and that was then trading at 82% of par. As I

write this, the junior issue has advanced to 97% of par. Let's

hope the market is right.

关于美国航空特别股的情况,比起一年前,我们现在乐观许多,不过这家公司最
后到底会变成怎样,我跟各位一样还是没有任何头绪,(事实上,观诸过去本人
在这项投资上的经验,或许各位的看法要比起我个人来得具参考价值),截至去
年底,我们帐列的特别股投资金额是票面金额的60%(此特别股并没有公开明确
的市价),虽然在此同时,美国航空还有另一项发行在外,除了转换价格之外,
其余的条件包含抵押顺位都不如我们的特别股,系以票面金额的82%左右的价
位进行交易,而就在我写这份年报的同时,其交易的价格已上涨为票面金额的
97%,衷心期盼市场的看法是对的。

Overall, our preferreds have performed well, but that is true

only because of one huge winner, Gillette. Leaving aside Gillette,

our preferreds as a group have delivered us after-tax returns no

more than equal to those we could have earned from the medium-term

fixed-income issues that they replaced.

总的来说,我们的特别股投资绩效算是相当不错的了,不过主要的原因还在于压
对了吉列特别股这个宝,若扣除吉列不记,我们其它的特别股投资带给我们的税
后盈余,大概仅与原先他们所取代的中期固定收益债券的投资报酬率差不了多
少。

A Proposed Recapitalization

股权重组提案

At the Annual Meeting you will be asked to approve a

recapitalization of Berkshire, creating two classes of stock. If

the plan is adopted, our existing common stock will be designated

as Class A Common Stock and a new Class B Common Stock will be

authorized.

今年的股东会将会有一项股权重组提案需要各位进行投票表决,一旦获得通过,
Berkshire原来发行的股份,将会被分拆为两种普通股,一种为A级普通股,一
种为B级普通股。

Each share of the "B" will have the rights of 1/30th of an "A"

share with these exceptions: First, a B share will have 1/200th of

the vote of an A share (rather than 1/30th of the vote). Second,

the B will not be eligible to participate in Berkshire's

shareholder-designated charitable contributions program.

B级普通股拥有A级普通股三十分之一的权利,除了以下两点,第一,B级普通
股的投票权只有A级普通股的二百分之一(而不是三十分之一),第二,B级普通
股不能参加Berkshire股东指定捐赠计划。

When the recapitalization is complete, each share of A will

become convertible, at the holder's option and at any time, into 30

shares of B. This conversion privilege will not extend in the

opposite direction. That is, holders of B shares will not be able

to convert them into A shares.

当股权重组完成之后,每一股A级普通股可以依持有人的自由意志在任何时候,
选择转换成30股的B级普通股,但反之则不行,也就是说30股的B级普通股
不能要求转换成一股的A级普通股。

We expect to list the B shares on the New York Stock Exchange,

where they will trade alongside the A stock. To create the

shareholder base necessary for a listing - and to ensure a liquid

market in the B stock - Berkshire expects to make a public offering

for cash of at least $100 million of new B shares. The offering

will be made only by means of a prospectus.

跟A级普通股一样,B级普通股也将在纽约证券交易所中挂牌交易,而为了维持
挂牌之后的流通性,Berkshire预计将会发行总金额1亿美元以上的B级普通
股,整个释股的过程将以透过公开说明书的方式进行。

The market will ultimately determine the price of the B

shares. Their price, though, should be in the neighborhood of

1/30th of the price of the A shares.

市场最终将会决定B级普通股的合理价格,当然若无特殊情况,B级普通股将会
以A级普通股三十分之一左右的价位进行交易。

Class A shareholders who wish to give gifts may find it

convenient to convert a share or two of their stock into Class B

shares. Additionally, arbitrage-related conversions will occur if

demand for the B is strong enough to push its price to slightly

above 1/30th of the price of A.

持有A级普通股的股东若有赠与的计划,将可以很轻易地先将持有的股份转为B
级普通股,当然可能也会有一些转换套利方面的交易可能使得B级普通股股价略
高于A级普通股股价的三十分之一。

However, because the Class A stock will entitle its holders to

full voting rights and access to Berkshire's contributions program,

these shares will be superior to the Class B shares and we would

expect most shareholders to remain holders of the Class A - which

is precisely what the Buffett and Munger families plan to do,

except in those instances when we ourselves might convert a few

shares to facilitate gifts. The prospect that most shareholders

will stick to the A stock suggests that it will enjoy a somewhat

more liquid market than the B.

然而,由于A级普通股还是享有完整的投票权以及参与Berkshire股东指定捐
赠计划的权利,所以就这方面而言,A级普通股还是比B级普通股来得好,所以
我们预期大部分的股东,就像巴菲特与曼格家族一样,还是会选择继续持有A
级普通股,除非有股东有赠与的考量时,可能会将少部份的股份进行转换,而由
于我们预期大部分会选择维持不变,所以A级普通股的流通性应该会比B级普
通股来得高。

There are tradeoffs for Berkshire in this recapitalization.

But they do not arise from the proceeds of the offering - we will

find constructive uses for the money - nor in any degree from the

price at which we will sell the B shares. As I write this - with

Berkshire stock at $36,000 - Charlie and I do not believe it

undervalued. Therefore, the offering we propose will not diminish

the per-share intrinsic value of our existing stock. Let me also

put our thoughts about valuation more baldly: Berkshire is selling

at a price at which Charlie and I would not consider buying it.

这次的股权重组对Berkshire来说有利有弊,原因不在于发行新股所带来的资
金,我们一定可以找到合理的用途,也不在于发行新股的价格,就在我撰写年报
的时刻,Berkshire的股价约为每股36,000美元,查理跟我本人都不认为这样
的价位过于低估,因此此次发行新股并不会使得公司原本的每股实质价值受到损
害,讲的再白一点,以现在的价位而言,查理跟我都不会考虑再加码买进
Berkshire的股份。

What Berkshire will incur by way of the B stock are certain

added costs, including those involving the mechanics of handling a

larger number of shareholders. On the other hand, the stock should

be a convenience for people wishing to make gifts. And those of

you who have hoped for a split have gained a do-it-yourself method

of bringing one about.

当然因为B级普通股的发行,Berkshire公司本身必须承担处理更多股东所带来
的股务作业,不过对于那些有赠与计划的股东来说,却变得方便许多,而对于喜
欢股票分割的投资人来说,也多了一个自助式分割的管道。

We are making this move, though, for other reasons - having to

do with the appearance of expense-laden unit trusts purporting to

be low-priced "clones" of Berkshire and sure to be aggressively

marketed. The idea behind these vehicles is not new: In recent

years, a number of people have told me about their wish to create

an "all-Berkshire" investment fund to be sold at a low dollar

price. But until recently, the promoters of these investments

heard out my objections and backed off.

当然,之所以会有这样的举动还有其它理由,主要是由于目前坊间出现一种模仿
Berkshire的信托基金,号称价位低,只要收取部份费用,人人都投资得起,这
样的主意并不是首次出现,近几年来,有一些人向我传达想要设立一种所谓的仿
Berkshire投资基金,以较低的价位对外发行,不过由于我个人并不赞同这样的
做法,所以这些人才没有进一步的举动。

I did not discourage these people because I prefer large

investors over small. Were it possible, Charlie and I would love

to turn $1,000 into $3,000 for multitudes of people who would find

that gain an important answer to their immediate problems.

对于这些人我不会一昧地打压,因为毕竟我们的目标锁定在大额投资人,如果可
能,查理跟我当然希望公司的净值可以直接由1,000美元翻个两、三翻立刻变
成3,000美元,如此一来大家因为这样的资本利得肯定不会再有其它的意见。

In order to quickly triple small stakes, however, we would

have to just as quickly turn our present market capitalization of

$43 billion into $129 billion (roughly the market cap of General

Electric, America's most highly valued company). We can't come

close to doing that. The very best we hope for is - on average - to

double Berkshire's per-share intrinsic value every five years, and

we may well fall far short of that goal.

为了将这些小筹码成长三倍,我们可能必须让Berkshire的市值从原本的430
亿美元,一下子暴增为1,290亿美元(这相当于通用电气-目前股票市场上市值
最高的公司),这根本就不可能办得到,所以我们比较希望的是,平均而言,
Berkshire的每股价值每五年能够翻一番,当然要达到这样的目标并不容易。

In the end, Charlie and I do not care whether our shareholders

own Berkshire in large or small amounts. What we wish for are

shareholders of any size who are knowledgeable about our

operations, share our objectives and long-term perspective, and are

aware of our limitations, most particularly those imposed by our

large capital base.

总而言之,查理跟我不太在乎我们的股东们拥有公司股份的多寡,我们衷心期盼
的是不论是大、小股东,都能了解我们的营运模式、与我们拥有共同的目标与长
期投资理念,同时也能够明?盼颐鞘艿降南拗疲?绕涫枪杀竟?蟊旧砑又钣栉颐?br> 的负荷。

The unit trusts that have recently surfaced fly in the face of

these goals. They would be sold by brokers working for big

commissions, would impose other burdensome costs on their

shareholders, and would be marketed en masse to unsophisticated

buyers, apt to be seduced by our past record and beguiled by the

publicity Berkshire and I have received in recent years. The sure

outcome: a multitude of investors destined to be disappointed.

这些基金最近纷纷以这样的号召浮上台面,通常它们都是透过经纪人以高额佣金
销售,所以加入的投资人必须背负相当沉重的成本,而一些不知情的投资人,可
能冲着Berkshire过去的成绩以及查理与我本人近年来的高知名度而受骗上
当,最后的结果肯定是?投资大众注定会大失所望。

Through our creation of the B stock - a low-denomination

product far superior to Berkshire-only trusts - we hope to make the

clones unmerchandisable.

所以透过B级普通股的诞生-一种低面额但远优于仿Berkshire基金的产物,我
们希望可以让那些模仿的假货无法在市场上生存。

But both present and prospective Berkshire shareholders should

pay special attention to one point: Though the per-share intrinsic

value of our stock has grown at an excellent rate during the past

five years, its market price has grown still faster. The stock, in

other words, has outperformed the business.

不过我们还是必须再次提醒Berkshire现有以及未来可能的股东,虽然在过去五
年间本公司的实质价值以相当快速的速度成长,不过公司本身的股价涨升速度却
有过之而无不及,换句话说,在这期间股票的市价表现远过于公司本业的表现。

That kind of market overperformance cannot persist indefinitely,

neither for Berkshire nor any other stock. Inevitably, there

will be periods of underperformance as well. The price

volatility that results, though endemic to public markets, is

not to our liking. What we would prefer instead is to have the

market price of Berkshire precisely track its intrinsic value.

Were the stock to do that, every shareholder would benefit during

his period of ownership in exact proportion to the progress

Berkshire itself made in the period.

这样的情况不太可能无止尽的持续下去,不管是Berkshire或是其它股票都一
样,无可避免的,总有一天股价的表现会逊于本业的表现,我们不太愿意见到公
司的股价受到股票市场影响而剧烈波动,我们比较喜欢的模式是Berkshire的股
价能够与其所代表的实质价值一致,如此一来我们就可以确保每位股东在持有本
公司股份的期间所获得的报酬皆能与Berkshire本身事业的发展状况一致。

Obviously, the market behavior of Berkshire's stock will never

conform to this ideal. But we will come closer to this goal than

we would otherwise if our present and prospective shareholders are

informed, business-oriented and not exposed to high-commission

salesmanship when making their investment decisions. To that end,

we are better off if we can blunt the merchandising efforts of the

unit trusts - and that is the reason we are creating the B stock.

很显然的Berkshire的股价不可能以这样理想的方式演变,不过若是我们能够确
定现有与未来的股东在做投资决策时,能得到充分的信息、以公司发展为导向且
不会受到高佣金的营业员所引诱,我们就越有可能达到这样的目标,基于这样的
前提,我们必须降低那些想要推销仿Berkshire基金的动机,这也是我们决定推
出B级普通股的主要原因。

We look forward to answering your questions about the

recapitalization at the Annual Meeting.

当然若大家对于本次股权重组还有任何问题,欢迎在股东年会上提出讨论。

Miscellaneous

其它事项

Berkshire isn't the only American corporation utilizing the

new, exciting ABWA strategy. At about 1:15 p.m. on July 14, 1995,

Michael Eisner, CEO of The Walt Disney Company, was walking up

Wildflower Lane in Sun Valley. At the same time, I was leaving a

lunch at Herbert Allen's home on that street to meet Tom Murphy,

CEO of Cap Cities/ABC, for a golf game.

Berkshire并不是第一家采用新颖有趣的ABWA走动式并购策略的美国企业,
1995年7月14日下午1点15分,当时华德迪斯尼的总裁Michael Eisner
正在Sun Valley的野花大道上行走,在此同时,我刚好从同一条街上Herber
Allen家中一场午宴离开,赶赴与资本城/ABC总裁Tom Murphy的一场高尔夫
球会。

That morning, speaking to a large group of executives and

money managers assembled by Allen's investment bank, Michael had

made a brilliant presentation about Disney, and upon seeing him, I

offered my congratulations. We chatted briefly - and the subject

of a possible combination of Disney and Cap Cities came up. This

wasn't the first time a merger had been discussed, but progress had

never before been made, in part because Disney wanted to buy with

cash and Cap Cities desired stock.

就在当天早上,面对由Allen的投资银行召集一大群企业总裁与基金经理人,
Michael做了一场有关迪斯尼相当精彩的演讲,会后在街上遇到他,于是我上前
向他致意,我们做了短暂的交谈,聊到迪斯尼与资本城进行合并的可能性,这并
不是第一次讨论有关合并的可能,先前之所以一直没有进展,一部份的原因是由
于迪斯尼希望用现金进行交易,而资本城想要拿股票。

Michael and I waited a few minutes for Murph to arrive, and in

the short conversation that ensued, both Michael and Murph

indicated they might bend on the stock/cash question. Within a few

weeks, they both did, at which point a contract was put together in

three very busy days.

Michael跟我花了几分钟等候Murph的到来,在接下来短暂的会谈后,双方同
意在现金/股票的问题上互做让步,几个星期后,双方达成协议,而经过连续三
天马不停蹄的谈判后,终于拟订了合并契约。

The Disney/Cap Cities deal makes so much sense that I'm sure

it would have occurred without that chance encounter in Sun Valley.

But when I ran into Michael that day on Wildflower Lane, he was

heading for his plane, so without that accidental meeting the deal

certainly wouldn't have happened in the time frame it did. I

believe both Disney and Cap Cities will benefit from the fact that

we all serendipitously met that day.

我认为迪斯尼与资本城的合并案是天造地设的一对,即使没有那天在Sun Valley
的巧遇,双方终究还是会结合,不过要不是那天刚好我在野花大道碰到正要赶飞
机的Michael,整个合并案可能不会那么快地顺利完成,不可讳言的,迪斯尼与
资本城都将因为我们那天的巧遇而受惠良多。

* * * * * * * * * * * *

It's appropriate that I say a few words here about Murph. To

put it simply, he is as fine an executive as I have ever seen in my

long exposure to business. Equally important, he possesses human

qualities every bit the equal of his managerial qualities. He's an

extraordinary friend, parent, husband and citizen. In those rare

instances in which Murph's personal interests diverged from those

of shareholders, he unfailingly favored the owners. When I say

that I like to be associated with managers whom I would love to

have as a sibling, in-law, or trustee of my will, Murph is the

exemplar of what I mean.

在这里我特别要提一下Murph,简单的说,他是我在投资生涯中,遇到最好的
经理人之一,同时除了优秀的管理特质之外,他也拥有同等的人格特质,他是一
位杰出的朋友、父亲、丈夫与公民,许多时候当其个人利益与股东利益相冲突时,
他毫不犹豫地会选择后者,每当我提到我喜欢与那种我希望他们能够成为我的子
孙、女婿或遗嘱执行人的经理人共事时,Murph就是我所能引用的最佳典范。

If Murph should elect to run another business, don't bother to

study its value - just buy the stock. And don't later be as dumb

as I was two years ago when I sold one-third of our holdings in Cap

Cities for $635 million (versus the $1.27 billion those shares

would bring in the Disney merger).

如果Murph决定另创事业,不必费心去研究其可行性,闭着眼睛投资就对了,
而且绝对不要笨到像我前年一样把资本城三分之一的持股以6.35亿美元卖掉,
这批股票在与迪斯尼合并后,价值超过12.7亿美元。

* * * * * * * * * * * *

About 96.3% of all eligible shares participated in Berkshire's

1995 shareholder-designated contributions program. Contributions

made were $11.6 million and 3,600 charities were recipients. A

full description of the shareholder-designated contributions

program appears on pages 54-55.

大约有96.3%的有效股权参与1995年的股东指定捐赠计划,总计约1,160万
美元捐出的款项分配给3,600家慈善机构,详细的名单参阅附录。

Every year a few shareholders miss out on the program because

they don't have their shares registered in their own names on the

prescribed record date or because they fail to get their

designation form back to us within the 60-day period allowed. That

second problem pained me especially this year because two good

friends with substantial holdings missed the deadline. We had to

deny their requests to be included because we can't make exceptions

for some shareholders while refusing to make them for others.

每年都有一小部份的股东由于没有将股份登记在本人的名下,或是没能在60天
的期限内,将指定捐赠的表格送回给我们,而没办法参加我们的指定捐赠计划,
尤其是第二个原因让我感到特别头痛,因为今年有二位Berkshire大股东同时也
是我个人的好朋友,未能在截止日以前将表格送达,我们必须忍痛将他们的指定
捐赠剔除,因为我们不可能在拒绝其它不符合规定股东的同时,还破例让他们参
与。

To participate in future programs, you must own Class A shares

that are registered in the name of the actual owner, not the

nominee name of a broker, bank or depository. Shares not so

registered on August 31, 1996, will be ineligible for the 1996

program. When you get the form, return it promptly so that it does

not get put aside or forgotten.

想要参加这项计划者,请必须拥有A级普通股,同时确定您的股份是登记在自
己而非股票经纪人或保管银行的名下,同时必须在1996年8月31日之前完成
登记,才有权利参与1996年的捐赠计划,当你收到表格后,请立即填写后寄回,
以免被丢在一旁给忘记了。

* * * * * * * * * * * *

When it comes to our Annual Meetings, Charlie and I are

managerial oddballs: We thoroughly enjoy the event. So come join

us on Monday, May 6. At Berkshire, we have no investor relations

department and don't use financial analysts as a channel for

disseminating information, earnings "guidance," or the like.

Instead, we prefer direct manager-to-owner communication and

believe that the Annual Meeting is the ideal place for this

interchange of ideas. Talking to you there is efficient for us and

also democratic in that all present simultaneously hear what we

have to say.

每次提到年度股东会,查理跟我就变成??舻睦贤罚?颐鞘翟谑呛芟不墩獬∈?br> 会,所以请大家务必在五月六日星期一大驾光临,在Berkshire我们没有投资人
公关部门,也从不依赖股票分析师当作信息沟通的桥梁,盈余的预估解说等等,
相反地,我们比较喜欢股东与经理人直接面对面的沟通,而且相信年度股东会正
是观念沟通的最佳场所,与各位一谈对我们来说一点也不会浪费时间,同时也让
各位以相当民主的方式听到我们想要跟各位传达的理念。

Last year, for the first time, we had the Annual Meeting at

the Holiday Convention Centre and the logistics seemed to work.

The ballroom there was filled with about 3,200 people, and we had a

video feed into a second room holding another 800 people. Seating

in the main room was a little tight, so this year we will probably

configure it to hold 3,000. This year we will also have two rooms

for the overflow.

去年我们首度在Holiday会议中心召开年度股东会,当初预定的准备动作事后
看起来相当正确,中央大厅坐满了3,200个人,同时藉由视听器材的辅助,旁
边的会议室还有800人得以参与,大厅显得有点拥挤,所以今年我们打算只排
3,000个座位,同时另外会再准备二间会议室以容纳更多的人参与。

All in all, we will be able to handle 5,000 shareholders. The

meeting will start at 9:30 a.m., but be warned that last year the

main ballroom was filled shortly after 8:00 a.m.

会场总共可以容纳5,000人,会议预定在9点30分开始,不过大家可能要早
一点到,因为去年中央大厅在8点过后不久便已座无虚席。

Shareholders from 49 states attended our 1995 meeting - where

were you, Vermont? - and a number of foreign countries, including

Australia, Sweden and Germany, were represented. As always, the

meeting attracted shareholders who were interested in Berkshire's

business - as contrasted to shareholders who are primarily

interested in themselves - and the questions were all good.

Charlie and I ate lunch on stage and answered questions for about

five hours.

来自49个州的股东参与1995年的年度股东会,你从哪里来,是佛蒙特州吗? 另
外还有一些股东来自海外地区,包含澳洲、瑞典与德国等国家,一如往常,年会
吸引了许多真正关心公司发展的股东参加,与其它只关心自己利益别的公司的股
东相较有很大的不同,所提出的问题也相当好,查理跟我花了五个多小时回答问
题,连午餐都直接在台上解决。

We feel that if owners come from all over the world, we should

try to make sure they have an opportunity to ask their questions.

Most shareholders leave about noon, but a thousand or so hardcore

types usually stay to see whether we will drop. Charlie and I are

in training to last at least five hours again this year.

因为我们认为股东们从世界各地远道而来,所以总是希望让他们都有机会可以发
问,大部分的股东在中午过后就纷纷离席,但还是有一千多名比较死忠的股东想
要瞧瞧我们到底能够撑多久,今年查理跟我希望尽量努力能够像去年那样至少撑
五个小时以上。

We will have our usual array of Berkshire products at the

meeting and this year will add a sales representative from GEICO.

At the 1995 meeting, we sold 747 pounds of candy, 759 pairs of

shoes, and over $17,500 of World Books and related publications.

In a move that might have been dangerous had our stock been weak,

we added knives last year from our Quikut subsidiary and sold 400

sets of these. (We draw the line at soft fruit, however.) All of

these goods will again be available this year. We don't consider a

cultural event complete unless a little business is mixed in.

依照惯例,我们在会场上展示了一些Berkshire的产品,今天将会新增一位
GEICO保险公司的业务代表,去年股东会总计卖出了747磅的糖果、759双的
鞋子以及价值超过17,500美元的世界百科全书与相关出版品,另外我们临时还
增加了旗下子公司Quikut所生产的小刀,总计卖出400把(幸好去年公司股价
表现不错,否则这可能是相当危险的一项举动),今年这些商品将再度与会,我
觉得这项盛会总要带点商业气息才算完整圆满。

Because we expect a large crowd for the meeting, we recommend

that you promptly get both plane and hotel reservations. Those of

you who like to be downtown (about six miles from the Centre) may

wish to stay at the Radisson Redick Tower, a small (88 rooms) but

nice hotel, or at the much larger Red Lion Hotel a few blocks away.

In the vicinity of the Centre are the Holiday Inn (403 rooms),

Homewood Suites (118 rooms) and Hampton Inn (136 rooms). Another

recommended spot is the Marriott, whose west Omaha location is

about 100 yards from Borsheim's and a ten-minute drive from the

Centre. There will be buses at the Marriott that will leave at

7:30, 8:00 and 8:30 for the meeting and return after it ends.

由于预期会有相当多的人与会,我们建议大家最好先预订机位与住宿,想要住在
市中心的人(距离会场约6英哩)可以选择拥有88个房间的一家小旅馆-
Radisson-Redick旅馆或是旁边较大一点的Red Lion旅馆,至于会场附近则有
Holiday Inn (403个房间)、Homewood Suites (118个房间)或Hampton Inn
(136个房间),另一个推荐的旅馆是位在奥玛哈西区的Marriott,离波仙珠宝店
约100公尺,距离会场约10分钟的车程,届时在哪里将会有巴士分7:30、8:00
跟8:30三班,接送大家往返股东会会场。

An attachment to our proxy material explains how you can

obtain the card you will need for admission to the meeting. A

good-sized parking area is available at the Centre, while those who

stay at the Holiday Inn, Homewood Suites and Hampton Inn will be

able to walk to the meeting. As usual, we will have buses to take

you to the Nebraska Furniture Mart and Borsheim's after the meeting

and to take you from there to hotels or the airport later.

后面附有股东会开会投票的相关数据,跟各位解释如何拿到入场所许的识别证,
当天会场有相当大的停车场,住在Holiday Inn 、Homewood Suites或
Hampton Inn的人可以直接走路过来开会,一如往年,会后我们备有巴士带大
家到内布拉斯加家具店与波仙珠宝店或是到饭店与机场。

NFM's main store, on its 64-acre site about two miles north of

the Centre, is open from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays, 10 a.m. to

6 p.m. on Saturdays, and noon to 6 p.m. on Sundays. Rose Blumkin -

"Mrs. B" - is now 102, but will be hard at work in Mrs. B's

Warehouse. She was honored in November at the opening of The Rose,

a classic downtown theater of the 20's that has been magnificently

restored, but that would have been demolished had she not saved it.

Ask her to tell you the story.

占地60英亩的NFM主馆距离会场约2英哩远,营业时间平日从早上10点到
下午9点,星期六从早上10点到下午6点,星期日则从中午开到下午6点,
Rose Blumkin-B太太今年高龄102岁,不过每天还是会到B太太仓库工作,
去年十一月她应邀到Rose表演中心担任开幕剪彩嘉宾,原本是20年代老旧的
戏院在B太太大力的支持下得以重新修复,记得问她有关这一段的故事。

Borsheim's normally is closed on Sunday but will be open for

shareholders and their guests from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on May 5th.

Additionally, we will have a special opening for shareholders on

Saturday, the 4th, from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. Last year, on

Shareholders Day, we wrote 1,733 tickets in the six hours we were

open - which is a sale every 13 seconds. Remember, though, that

records are made to be broken.

平时礼拜天不营业的波仙珠宝,特地在五月五日股东会当天会为股东与来宾开
放,从中午开到下午6点,此外今年在五月四日星期六股东会的前一晚从下午6
点到晚上9点,还将特地为股东开放,去年股东会当天,在短短六个小时的营
业时间内,我们总共收到1,733张订单,等于每13秒就有一笔生意成交,各位
请记得记录本来就是用来打破的。

At Borsheim's, we will also have the world's largest faceted

diamond on display. Two years in the cutting, this inconspicuous

bauble is 545 carats in size. Please inspect this stone and let it

guide you in determining what size gem is appropriate for the one

you love.

在波仙珠宝店,将会展出一颗全世界最大的平面钻石,花费两年的时间切割,这
颗不甚起眼的玩意儿总共有545克拉重,请大家好好看看这一颗石头,然后再
决定你应该为你心爱的人买一颗多大的宝石。

On Saturday evening, May 4, there will be a baseball game at

Rosenblatt Stadium between the Omaha Royals and the Louisville

Redbirds. I expect to make the opening pitch - owning a quarter of

the team assures me of one start per year - but our manager, Mike

Jirschele, will probably make his usual mistake and yank me

immediately after. About 1,700 shareholders attended last year's

game. Unfortunately, we had a rain-out, which greatly disappointed

the many scouts in the stands. But the smart ones will be back

this year, and I plan to show them my best stuff.

在前一天5月4日,星期六晚上,Rosenblatt体育馆将会有一场奥玛哈皇家
队对路易维里红鸟队的比赛,我准备在开幕时担任开球工作,拥有该队四分之一
的所有权确保我可以每年担任一次先发,不过一如往常我们的球队经理-Mike
大概都会做出错误的决定,很快地就把我拉下场,去年大约有1,700位股东出
席这项盛会,可惜的是当晚因雨停赛,使得旁边的球僮失望不已,今年好戏将会
重新上演,而我也准备将拿手绝活展现出来。

Our proxy statement will include information about obtaining

tickets to the game. We will also offer an information packet this

year listing restaurants that will be open on Sunday night and

describing various things that you can do in Omaha on the weekend.

股东会数据将告诉大家如何取得入场的门票,同时我们也会提供星期天晚上会开
张的餐厅信息,同时列出假日期间在奥玛哈你可以从事的活动介绍。

For years, I've unsuccessfully tried to get my grade school

classmate, "Pal" Gorat, to open his steakhouse for business on the

Sunday evening preceding the meeting. But this year he's relented.

Gorat's is a family-owned enterprise that has thrived for 52

years, and if you like steaks, you'll love this place. I've told

Pal he will get a good crowd, so call Gorat's at 402-551-3733 for a

reservation. You'll spot me there - I'll be the one eating the

rare T-bone with a double order of hash browns.

多年来我一直无法成功说服我的小学同学-Gorat所开的餐厅在年会当天晚上开
门营业,不过今年他终于屈服,Gorat's是一家有52年历史的老牌餐厅,如果
你爱吃牛排,包准你会爱上这个地方,我已向Gorat拍胸脯保证一定会有很多
顾客上门,所以记得打电话(402-551-3733)去预订,我保证大家一定可以在
那里看到我,通常我会点一大份丁骨牛排加上双份的肉丸。

Warren E. Buffett

March 1, 1996 Chairman of the Board

(责任编辑:)
------分隔线----------------------------
发表评论
请自觉遵守互联网相关的政策法规,严禁发布色情、暴力、反动的言论。
评价:
表情:
用户名: 验证码:
发布者资料
查看详细资料 发送留言 加为好友 用户等级: 注册时间:2024-09-21 17:09 最后登录:2024-09-21 17:09
栏目列表
推荐内容